Citation network
Denton Vs. Hernandez
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 25 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Denton, Director of Corrections of California, Et Al. V. HernandezSearch
-
adhered to these positions on remand from this Court for consideration of the Court's intervening decision in Neitzke v. WilliamsSearch
-
d). In Neitzke v. WilliamsSearch
-
Amended Complaint in Hernandez v. YlstSearch
-
Motion to Amend Complaint in Hernandez v. DentonSearch
-
Complaint in Hernandez v. YlstSearch
-
Exhibit G to Motion to Amend Complaint in Hernandez v. DentonSearch
-
Reviewing the dismissal de novo, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. Her nandez v. DentonSearch
-
the judgment, and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of our intervening decision in Neitzke v. WilliamsSearch
-
Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
and that it was error for the Court of Appeals to review the dismissal of Hernandez's claims de novo. Cf. Boag v. MacDougallSearch
-
the Court of Appeals to consider, among other things, whether the plaintiff was proceeding pro se, see Haines v. KernerSearch
-
a res judicata effect on frivolousness determinations for future in forma pauperis petitions. See, e. g., Bryant v. CivilettiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Warren v. McCallSearch
-
cf. Rogers v. BruntragerSearch
-
amend the complaint to overcome any deficiency unless it is clear that no amendment can cure the defect. E. g., Potter v. McCallSearch
-
Noll v. CarlsonSearch
-
case without expressing any view on the proper application of that standard to the facts of the case. See, e. g., Rufo v. InmatesSearch
-
Syllabus Denton, Director of Corrections of California, Et Al. V. HernandezSearch
-
In Neitzke v. WilliamsSearch
-
Hernandez v. YlstSearch
-
Hernandez v. DentonSearch
-
Cf. Boag v. MacDougallSearch
-
Bryant v. CivilettiSearch
-
Rogers v. BruntragerSearch
-
Potter v. McCallSearch
-
Rufo v. InmatesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial