Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Williams Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 09, 1992

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 1 linked 40 unlinked
Show
  1. Solem Vs. Helm US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1983
  2. Williams v. United
    Search
  3. States - 503 U.S. 193 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Williams V. United
    Search
  4. g)(1). The presentence report assigned Williams a criminal history category of V. App
    Search
  5. of Appeals nevertheless affirmed Williams' sentence. It relied upon the Seventh Circuit precedent of United States v. Franklin
    Search
  6. considered Williams' prior conviction for the same offense in its decision to depart. See post, at 208. 198 v. United
    Search
  7. district court's departure from the guideline range is based on both valid and invalid factors. Compare United States v. Zamarripa
    Search
  8. United States v. Hernandez-Vasquez
    Search
  9. F. 2d 1314, 1315-1316 (CA9 1989) (same), with United States v. Franklin
    Search
  10. United States v. Rodriguez
    Search
  11. United States v. Hummer
    Search
  12. implication, they prohibit a departure based on nonsimilar outdated convictions. Compare, e. g., United States v. Aymelek
    Search
  13. United States v. Russell
    Search
  14. F.2d 1439 , 1444 (CAlO 1990) (same), with United States v. Leake
    Search
  15. the appellate review of a departure sentence. This view has carried the day in the Fourth Circuit. See United States v. Summers
    Search
  16. invalidly finding an aggravat- 11 This confusion apparently stems from both parties' citation of United States v. Hernandez-Vasquez
    Search
  17. F.2d 1314 (CA9 1989) (per curiam), and United States v. Zamarripa
    Search
  18. Instead, both cases simply rely on United States v. Nuno-Para
    Search
  19. see also United States v. White
    Search
  20. United States v. Diaz-
    Search
  21. does not conform with the appellate court's mandate. See United States v. Stephenson
    Search
  22. F.2d 57 , 62 (CA5 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Goff v. United
    Search
  23. essential to assure that the guidelines are ap- 17The majority obliquely references Solem v. Helm
    Search
  24. the simple principle that sentences imposed by district courts within legal limits should not be disturbed. Dorszynski v. United
    Search
  25. Gore v. United
    Search
  26. F. 2d, at 1580 (citing United States v. Franklin
    Search
  27. United States v. Schmude
    Search
  28. Syllabus Williams V. United
    Search
  29. of United States v. Franklin
    Search
  30. Compare United States v. Zamarripa
    Search
  31. United States v. Franklin
    Search
  32. United States v. Aymelek
    Search
  33. United States v. Leake
    Search
  34. the Fourth Circuit. See United States v. Summers
    Search
  35. of United States v. Hernandez-Vasquez
    Search
  36. and United States v. Zamarripa
    Search
  37. United States v. Nuno-Para
    Search
  38. United States v. White
    Search
  39. See United States v. Stephenson
    Search
  40. Goff v. United
    Search
  41. Dorszynski v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales