Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Espinosa Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 29, 1992

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Stringer Vs. Black US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1991
  2. Parker Vs. Dugger US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1991
  3. Clemons Vs. Mississippi US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1990
  4. Maynard Vs. Cartwright US Supreme Court · Jun 06, 1988
  5. Godfrey Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · May 19, 1980
  6. U.S. 1079 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Espinosa V. Florida
    Search
  7. the text of the jury instruction on the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating factor upon the rationale of Smalley v. State
    Search
  8. circumstances, the weighing of an invalid aggravating circumstance violates the Eighth Amendment. See Sochor v. Florida
    Search
  9. instructions more specific and elaborate than the one given in the instant case unconstitutionally vague. See Shell v. Mississippi
    Search
  10. lacking in Shell, Cartwright, or Godfrey. Instead, echoing the State Supreme Court's reasoning in Smalley v. State
    Search
  11. to the jury's recommendation, whether that recommendation be life, see Tedder v. State
    Search
  12. So. 2d 908, 910 (Fla. 1975), or death, see Smith v. State
    Search
  13. Grossman v. State
    Search
  14. did not directly weigh any invalid aggravating circumstances. But, we must presume that the jury did so, see Mills v. Maryland
    Search
  15. U. S. 367, 376-377 (1988), just as we must further presume that the trial court followed Florida law, cf. Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  16. creates the same potential for arbitrariness as the direct weighing of an invalid aggravating factor, cf. Baldwin v. Alabama
    Search
  17. set the case down for oral argument. JUSTICE SCALIA, dissenting. For the reasons given in my opinion in Sochor v. Florida
    Search
  18. requirement of Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  19. with that requirement is the only special capital sentencing procedure that the Eighth Amendment demands. See Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  20. Syllabus Espinosa V. Florida
    Search
  21. of Smalley v. State
    Search
  22. the Eighth Amendment. See Sochor v. Florida
    Search
  23. See Shell v. Mississippi
    Search
  24. Smalley v. State
    Search
  25. Tedder v. State
    Search
  26. Smith v. State
    Search
  27. Mills v. Maryland
    Search
  28. Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  29. Baldwin v. Alabama
    Search
  30. Sochor v. Florida
    Search
  31. of Furman v. Georgia
    Search
  32. See Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  33. Spaziano v. Florida
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial