Citation network
Saudi Arabia Vs. Nelson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 30, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 349 (1992) October Term, 1992 Syllabus Saudi Arabia Et Al. V. NelsonSearch
-
theory of foreign sovereign immunity, Republic of Argentina v. WeltoverSearch
-
thwart the Act's manifest purpose to codify the restrictive theory of foreign sovereign immunity. Cf. United States v. ShearerSearch
-
on a motion to dismiss the complaint, we assume that we have truthful factual allegations before us, see United States v. GaubertSearch
-
Argentine Republic v. AmeradaSearch
-
for purposes of the Act. See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. FederalSearch
-
elements of a claim that, if proven, would entitle a plaintiff to relief under his theory of the case. See Callejo v. BancomerSearch
-
accord, Santos v. CompagnieSearch
-
Millen Industries, Inc. v. CoordinationSearch
-
among descriptions juxtaposed against each other are naturally understood to be significant, see Melkonyan v. Sulli-Search
-
Republic of Argentina v. WeltoverSearch
-
Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. RepublicSearch
-
police has long been understood for purposes of the restrictive theory as peculiarly sovereign in nature. See Arango v. GuzmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Victory Transport Inc. v. ComisariaSearch
-
Herbage v. MeeseSearch
-
have been known to retaliate by enlisting the help of police officers to falsely arrest employees. See, e. g., Rosario v. AmalgamatedSearch
-
Co., 398 U. S. 144 (1970), and for using private security personnel for the same purposes, see Albright v. LongviewSearch
-
action would be based on the operation by Saudi Arabia's agents of a commercial business.2 1 See, e. g., English v. GeneralSearch
-
Belline v. K-MartSearch
-
White v. GeneralSearch
-
Sanchez v. UnemploymentSearch
-
Collier v. SuperiorSearch
-
that did not take place in a commercial context and that could be considered purely sovereign. For instance, in Arango v. GuzmanSearch
-
Id., at 1379. Nor was there a hint of commercial activity in Herbage v. MeeseSearch
-
Bank of United States v. Planters'Search
-
Bank of Georgia, 9 Wheat. 904, 907 (1824). See also Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. RepublicSearch
-
was a mere tourist in Saudi Arabia and had been summarily expelled by order of immigration officials. See Arango v. GuzmanSearch
-
information during employee recruiting is commercial activity as we have described it. See Republic of Argentina v. WeltoverSearch
-
First Nat. City Bank v. BancoSearch
-
Id., at 622, The majority's citation of United States v. ShearerSearch
-
negligence terms what was essentially an intentional tort claim, but that case was decided under the doctrine of Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
under certain circumstances, we have permitted recovery in that situation. See Sheridan v. UnitedSearch
-
suit, which raised an identical failure to warn claim, not only as time barred, but also on the merits. See Nelson v. HospitalSearch
-
of BLACKMUN, J. ants, whose recruitment of Nelson took place almost entirely through HCA. See generally Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Lawlor v. NationalSearch
-
quoting Bigelow v. OldSearch
-
See, e. g., Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. RepublicSearch
-
with the view expressed by Judge Higginbotham in his separate opinion in Vencedora Oceanica Navigacion, S. A. v. CompagnieSearch
-
Syllabus Saudi Arabia Et Al. V. NelsonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. ShearerSearch
-
of the Act. See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. FederalSearch
-
See Callejo v. BancomerSearch
-
Santos v. CompagnieSearch
-
Melkonyan v. Sulli-Search
-
See Arango v. GuzmanSearch
-
Rosario v. AmalgamatedSearch
-
Albright v. LongviewSearch
-
English v. GeneralSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial