Citation network
Grogan Vs. Garner
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 279 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Grogan v. GarnerSearch
-
U.S. 279 (1991) Grogan v. GarnerSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reduced the damages award, but affirmed the fraud judgment as modified. Grogan v. GarnerSearch
-
The validity of a creditor's claim is determined by rules of state law. See Vanston Bondholders Protective Comm. v. GreenSearch
-
issue of nondischargeability has been a matter of federal law governed by the terms of the Bankruptcy Code. See Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSearch
-
Addington v. TexasSearch
-
right to a discharge in bankruptcy. See United States v. KrasSearch
-
SEC v. C.MSearch
-
First National Monetary Corp. v. WeinbergerSearch
-
F.2d 1334, 1341-1342 (CA6 1987) (civil fraud provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act). Cf. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. ImrexSearch
-
many courts imposed the preponderance burden on creditors invoking the fraud discharge exception. See, e.g., Sweet v. RitterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Nickel Plate Cloverleaf Federal Credit Union v. WhiteSearch
-
Gonzales v. AetnaSearch
-
Beneficial Finance Co. of Manchester v. MachieSearch
-
Budget Finance Plan v. HanerSearch
-
Atlas Credit Corp. v. MillerSearch
-
Household Finance Corp. v. AltenbergSearch
-
MAC Finance Plan of Nashua, Inc. v. StoneSearch
-
in 1978, the courts continued to be nearly evenly split over the appropriate standard of proof. Compare, e.g., Fierman v. LazarusSearch
-
In re Scott, 1 BCD 581, 583 (Bkrtcy.Ct. WD Mich.1975) with Brown v. BuchananSearch
-
to judgment. This result accords with the historical development of the discharge exceptions. As we explained in Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
Stat. 798. This alteration was intended to broaden the coverage of the fraud exceptions. See Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. RebhanSearch
-
Combs v. RichardsonSearch
-
particular debts were excepted, and instead allowed those questions to be litigated in the state courts. See Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
for fraud, away from the state courts and vested jurisdiction exclusively in the bankruptcy courts. See Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
principles of collateral estoppel apply in bankruptcy proceedings under the current Bankruptcy Code. See, e.g., Kelly v. RobinsonSearch
-
U.S. at 442 U. S. 139 , n. 10. Cf. Heiser v. WoodruffSearch
-
Klingman v. LevinsonSearch
-
In re Shuler, 722 F.2d 1253, 1256 (CA5), cert. denied sub nom. Harold V. SimpsonSearch
-
Co. v. ShulerSearch
-
Goss v. GossSearch
-
Lovell v. MixonSearch
-
Spilman v. HarleySearch
-
CA9) (prior judgment establishes only a prima facie case of nondischargeability), cert. denied, sub nom. Gregg v. RahmSearch
-
See Crandon v. UnitedSearch
-
K Mart Corp. v. CartierSearch
-
Union Bank v. BlumSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Grogan v. GarnerSearch
-
See Vanston Bondholders Protective Comm. v. GreenSearch
-
of the Bankruptcy Code. See Brown v. FelsenSearch
-
Addington v. TexasSearch
-
See United States v. KrasSearch
-
of the Commodity Exchange Act). Cf. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. ImrexSearch
-
Sweet v. RitterSearch
-
Fierman v. LazarusSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial