Citation network
Board of Educ. Vs. Dowell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 237 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Board of Educ. v. DowellSearch
-
U.S. 237 (1991) Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSearch
-
United States v. SwiftSearch
-
of the Board. Pp. 498 U. S. 246 -248. (b) The Court of Appeals also erred in relying on United States v. W.TSearch
-
school system -- one that was intentionally segregated by race. Dowell v. SchoolSearch
-
zoning failed to remedy past segregation because residential segregation resulted in one-race schools. Dowell v. SchoolSearch
-
Dowel v. BoardSearch
-
was res judicata as to those who were then parties to the action, and that the district remained unitary. Dowell v. BoardSearch
-
concluded that court-ordered desegregation must end. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed, Dowell v. BoardSearch
-
Id. at 1486. Relying on United States v. SwiftSearch
-
F.2d at 1504 (quoting Dayton Bd. of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
resolve a conflict between the standard laid down by the Court of Appeals in this case and that laid down in Spangler v. PasadenaSearch
-
City Board of Education, 611 F.2d 1239 (CA9 1979), and Riddick v. SchoolSearch
-
identify a school district that has completely remedied all vestiges of past discrimination. See, e.g., United States v. OvertonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Riddick v. SchoolSearch
-
Vaughns v. BoardSearch
-
CA4 1985). Under that interpretation of the word, a unitary school district is one that has met the mandate of Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 349 U. S. 294 (1955), and Green v. NewSearch
-
of past discrimination. That there is such confusion is evident in Georgia State Conference of Branches of NAACP v. GeorgiaSearch
-
The court explained that a school district that has not operated segregated schools as proscribed by Green v. NewSearch
-
Kent County School Board, supra, and Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
of the district, it did not finally terminate the Oklahoma City school litigation. In Pasadena City Bd of Education v. SpanglerSearch
-
from the court. III The Court of Appeals relied upon language from this Court's decision in United States v. SwiftSearch
-
F.2d at 1491, relying on United States v. W.TSearch
-
It was in this context that the language relied upon by the Court of Appeals in this case was used. United States v. UnitedSearch
-
is required of the school board. In Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
citizens to participate in decisionmaking, and allows innovation so that school programs can fit local needs. Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSearch
-
systems not extend beyond the time required to remedy the effects of past intentional discrimination. See Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
Spangler v. PasadenaSearch
-
on our decision in United States v. W.TSearch
-
then evaluate the Board's decision to implement the SRP under appropriate equal protection principles. See Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. PageSearch
-
of a school desegregation decree must reflect the central aim of our school desegregation precedents. In Brown v. BoardSearch
-
de jure segregated school districts take all feasible steps to eliminate racially identifiable schools. See Green v. NewSearch
-
Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
of Afro-American children Page 498 U. S. 253 from all other races in the public school system. Dowell v. SchoolSearch
-
at 433-434. Matters did not change in Oklahoma City after this Court's decision in Brown I and Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Dowell v. SchoolSearch
-
de jure segregated school districts to come forward with realistic plans for immediate relief, see Green v. NewSearch
-
Dowell v. BoardSearch
-
as incorporated in the decree, have been fully achieved. Ante at 498 U. S. 247 , citing United States v. SwiftSearch
-
Co., 286 U. S. 106 (1932). See United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Pasadena City Bd of Education v. SpanglerSearch
-
In the decisions leading up to Brown I, the Court had attempted to curtail the ugly legacy of Plessy v. FergusonSearch
-
considerations. See, e.g., Sweatt v. PainterSearch
-
Sipuel v. BoardSearch
-
inform the standard by which the Court determines the effectiveness of a proposed desegregation remedy. See Green v. NewSearch
-
inflict the stigmatizing injury that Brown I sought to cure. Page 498 U. S. 259 Ibid. Accord, Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial