Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Smith

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 20, 1991

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 2 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Westfall Vs. Erwin US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1988
  2. Randall Vs. Loftsgaarden US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1986
  3. U.S. 160 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Smith
    Search
  4. U.S. 160 (1991) United States v. Smith
    Search
  5. the Liability Reform Act as an amendment to the FTCA. Congress took this action in response to our ruling in Westfall v. Erwin
    Search
  6. Andrus v. Glover
    Search
  7. Page 499 U. S. 169 in tort, subject to certain exceptions. See, e.g., Peoples Nat. Bank of Huntsville, Ala. v. Meredith
    Search
  8. Queen v. Tennessee
    Search
  9. the well established principle of statutory interpretation that implied repeals should be avoided. See, e.g., Randall v. Loftsgaarden
    Search
  10. Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  11. Following the Liability Reform Act's enactment and the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  12. the applicability of the Gonzalez Act. See Brief for United States 5, n. 3. Following the rationale of Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  13. the Liability Reform Act applies even when an FTCA exception precludes liability against the Government. See Nasuti v. Scannell
    Search
  14. Mitchell v. Carlson
    Search
  15. Aviles v. Lutz
    Search
  16. F.2d 1046 (CA10 1989). The Eleventh Circuit has taken the opposite position. See Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  17. See Bivens v. Six
    Search
  18. The Gonzalez Act was passed in response to the decision in Henderson v. Bluemink
    Search
  19. Jackson v. Kelly
    Search
  20. F.2d 735, 740-741 (CA10 1977) (endorsing this view in dictum). But cf. Powers v. Schultz
    Search
  21. still serves to protect foreign-based military personnel against malpractice suits in foreign courts. See Powers v. Schultz
    Search
  22. of the Gonzalez Act. II The Liability Reform Act was a direct response to this Court's decision in Westfall v. Erwin
    Search
  23. In Westfall v. Erwin
    Search
  24. Recent judicial decisions, and particularly the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Westfall v. Erwin
    Search
  25. In its opinion in Westfall v. Erwin
    Search
  26. to the well established rule that meaning should be attributed to each subsection of a statute. See United States v. Morton
    Search
  27. Jackson v. Kelly
    Search
  28. respondents after the Court's decision today is the possibility of a private bill. See Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Smith
    Search
  30. Peoples Nat. Bank of Huntsville, Ala. v. Meredith
    Search
  31. of Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  32. the Government. See Nasuti v. Scannell
    Search
  33. See Newman v. Soballe
    Search
  34. Henderson v. Bluemink
    Search
  35. Powers v. Schultz
    Search
  36. See Powers v. Schultz
    Search
  37. See United States v. Morton
    Search
  38. See Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial