Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Gaubert

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 26, 1991

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 32 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 315 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Gaubert
    Search
  2. U.S. 315 (1991) United States v. Gaubert
    Search
  3. a). The Court of Appeals reversed in part. Relying on Indian Towing Co. v. United
    Search
  4. affairs regularly requires judgment as to which of a range of permissive courses is the wisest. Neither Dalehite v. United
    Search
  5. Indian Towing, supra, nor Berkovitz v. United
    Search
  6. affirmed in part and reversed in part. 885 F.2d 1284 (1989). Relying on this Court's decision in Indian Towing Co. v. United
    Search
  7. not. 885 F.2d at 1287. After claiming further support for this distinction in this Court's decisions in United States v. S.A
    Search
  8. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), 467 U. S. 797 (1984), and Berkovitz v. United
    Search
  9. Dalehite v. United
    Search
  10. that regulators have the authority to use such tactics in supervising financial institutions. In United States v. Philadelphia
    Search
  11. had improperly pressured a savings and loan's directors to resign. See Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Callander
    Search
  12. by regulators exercising day-to-day supervisory authority would be actionable. This is not the rule of our cases. v. Because
    Search
  13. FDIC for failure to institute statutory receivership proceedings against a thrift. See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Mmahat
    Search
  14. Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) does not protect all governmental activities involving an element of choice. Berkovitz v. United
    Search
  15. United States v. Varig
    Search
  16. looking not only to the decision but also to the officer who made it, recognizes that there is something to the planning v. operational
    Search
  17. is not protected by this exception because, even if he carefully calculated considerations of cost to the government v. safety
    Search
  18. Page 499 U. S. 336 effect is protected, because weighing those considerations is his task. Cf. Dalehite v. United
    Search
  19. States, 346 U. S. 15 (1953). In Indian Towing Co. v. United
    Search
  20. liability for the negligence of a vehicle driver. See ante at 499 U. S. 325 , n. 7. The need for expedition vs. the
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Gaubert
    Search
  22. Indian Towing Co. v. United
    Search
  23. Neither Dalehite v. United
    Search
  24. Berkovitz v. United
    Search
  25. United States v. S.A
    Search
  26. and Berkovitz v. United
    Search
  27. Dalehite v. United
    Search
  28. In United States v. Philadelphia
    Search
  29. See Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Callander
    Search
  30. See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Mmahat
    Search
  31. Cf. Dalehite v. United
    Search
  32. In Indian Towing Co. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial