Citation network
Gilmer Vs. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 13, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
s registration application and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The court denied the motion, based on Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
may be the subject of an arbitration agreement, enforceable pursuant to the FAA. See, e.g., Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. SolerSearch
-
U. S. 614 . Since the FAA manifests a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration, Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
defrauded into agreeing to the arbitration clause. P. 500 U. S. 32 -33. (e) Gilmer's reliance on Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
et seq. The District Court denied Interstate's motion, based on this Court's decision in Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
courts, and to place arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSearch
-
Scherk v. Alberto-CulverSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
See Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. SolerSearch
-
American Express Inc. v. McMahonSearch
-
is designed not only to address individual grievances, but also to further important social policies. See, e.g., EEOC v. WyomingSearch
-
all employment disputes. Such disputes can be settled, for example, without any EEOC involvement. See, e.g., Coventry v. UnitedSearch
-
Moore v. McGrawSearch
-
Runyan v. NationalSearch
-
Nicholson v. CPCSearch
-
IV In addition to the arguments discussed above, Gilmer vigorously asserts that our decision in Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
Co., 415 U. S. 36 (1974), and its progeny -- Barrentine v. Arkansas-BestSearch
-
Freight System, Inc., 450 U. S. 728 (1981), and McDonald v. CitySearch
-
Compare the decision below with Nicholson v. CPCSearch
-
of the FAA is inapplicable to arbitration clauses contained in such registration applications. See, e.g., Dickstein v. DuPontSearch
-
Malison v. PrudentialSearch
-
Legg, Mason & Co. v. MackallSearch
-
Tonetti v. ShirleySearch
-
Stokes v. MerrillSearch
-
Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 523 F.2d 433, 436 (CA6 1975). We implicitly assumed as much in Perry v. ThomasSearch
-
The Court in Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. SolerSearch
-
by the actual questions presented. See, e.g., Teague v. LaneSearch
-
decided cases on grounds not argued in any of the courts below or in the petitions for certiorari. In Arcadia v. OhioSearch
-
Id. at Page 500 U. S. 38 498 U. S. 77 . Similarly, in McCleskey v. ZantSearch
-
only to individual contracts of employment, but also to collective bargaining agreements. See Lincoln Mills of Ala. v. TextileSearch
-
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. MillerSearch
-
Amalgamated Assn. of Street, Electric R. and Motor Coach Employees of America v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Page 500 U. S. 41 briefed at great length in Lincoln Mills and its companion cases, Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. TextileSearch
-
Workers, 353 U. S. 550 (1957), and General Electric Co. v. ElectricalSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
to issue broad injunctive relief is the cornerstone to eliminating discrimination in society. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
Barrentine v. Arkansas-BestSearch
-
abandoned its earlier view that statutory claims were not appropriate subjects for arbitration. See Mitsubishi Motors v. SolerSearch
-
See Perry v. ThomasSearch
-
Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
Coventry v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial