Citation network
Florida Vs. Jimeno
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 23, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 248 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. JimenoSearch
-
U.S. 248 (1991) Florida v. JimenoSearch
-
Ibid. (citation omitted). The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, relying upon its decision in State v. WellsSearch
-
the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. The touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
it merely proscribes those which are unreasonable. Illinois v. RodriguezSearch
-
is no doubt reasonable for the police to conduct a search once they have been permitted to do so. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
of the car. We think that it is. The scope of a search is generally defined by its expressed object. United States v. RossSearch
-
to the paper bag lying on the car's floor. The facts of this case are therefore different from those in State v. WellsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
for adding this sort of superstructure to the Fourth Amendment's basic test of objective reasonableness. Cf. Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
for one's personal effects, and its passengers and contents are generally exposed to public view. See Cardwell v. LewisSearch
-
an individual has a heightened expectation of privacy in the contents of a closed container. See, e.g., United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
In this situation, the individual still retains a heightened expectation of privacy in the container. See Robbins v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ante at 500 U. S. 252 , quoting Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
from an otherwise unlawful search -- without being told that he had the right to withhold his consent. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. JimenoSearch
-
State v. WellsSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
See Cardwell v. LewisSearch
-
See Robbins v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
United States v. RossSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial