Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

illinois Vs. Kentucky

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 28, 1991

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 32 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 380 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. Kentucky
    Search
  2. U.S. 380 (1991) Illinois v. Kentucky
    Search
  3. a) This is the rule that was used to determine the boundary between Kentucky and its neighboring States of Ohio, Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  4. U. S. 335 , and Indiana, Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  5. in large measure with the Special Master's report. The threshold issue presented in this case was resolved in Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  6. upon reaching statehood in 1792. Id. at 444 U. S. 337 -338. We relied on the prior opinion in Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  7. if this case were before the Court simply as a matter of law, Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  8. in original). Kentucky's exceptions assume, rather, that the case does not turn on the issue of law decided in Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  9. Georgia v. South
    Search
  10. the burden to prove Illinois' long acquiescence in those acts of possession and jurisdiction. As we stated in Oklahoma v. Texas
    Search
  11. Georgia v. South
    Search
  12. in deciding Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  13. recent Illinois case dealing with the State's river boundary that has come to our attention. See People ex rel. Scott v. Dravo
    Search
  14. took an even less hospitable view of Kentucky's interests than the Illinois Constitution did. In Joyce-Watkins Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  15. This description of the boundary was followed by Illinois courts until at least 1973, see People ex rel. Scott v. Dravo
    Search
  16. Corp., supra, and while it plainly conflicts with our decisions in Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  17. U. S. 479 (1890) and Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  18. The Special Master correctly observed that the laches defense is generally inapplicable against a State. See Block v. North
    Search
  19. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United
    Search
  20. and statutes of limitations, it does so through the doctrine of prescription and acquiescence, see generally Georgia v. South
    Search
  21. stemming from the cession by Virginia of the land northwest of the river to the United States. Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. Kentucky
    Search
  23. States of Ohio, Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  24. and Indiana, Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search
  25. Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  26. Oklahoma v. Texas
    Search
  27. Scott v. Dravo
    Search
  28. In Joyce-Watkins Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  29. and Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  30. State. See Block v. North
    Search
  31. the United States. Ohio v. Kentucky
    Search
  32. Indiana v. Kentucky
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial