Citation network
Lehnert Vs. Ferris Faculty Ass'n
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 30, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Lehnert v. FerrisSearch
-
Faculty Ass'n - 500 U.S. 507 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Lehnert v. FerrisSearch
-
Faculty Ass'n, 500 U.S. 507 (1991) Lehnert v. FerrisSearch
-
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Syllabus Subsequent to Abood V. DetroitSearch
-
unit's protection, even if it is not actually expended on that unit in any particular membership year. Cf. Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
only for the costs of performing the union's statutory duties as exclusive bargaining agent. See, e.g., Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Subsequent to this Court's decision in Abood v. DetroitSearch
-
provisions such as the agency shop agreement at issue here. The Court first addressed the question in Railway Employee v. HansonSearch
-
campaigns to which reluctant union members are opposed. The Court addressed that issue under the RLA in Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
funds in support of political causes to which those employees objected. Two years later, in Railway Clerks v. AllenSearch
-
Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
albeit indirectly, to the promotion of such positions implicates core First Amendment concerns. See, e.g., Wooley v. MaynardSearch
-
principles that prevent a State from conditioning public employment upon association with a political party, see Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
U. S. 347 (1976) (plurality opinion), or upon professed religious allegiance, see Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
Ibid. See Page 500 U. S. 519 also Keller v. StateSearch
-
Bar of California, 496 U. S. 1 (1990), and Communications Workers v. BeckSearch
-
F.2d at 1392, quoting Robinson v. NewSearch
-
problem that would otherwise accompany Page 500 U. S. 521 union recognition. Chicago Teachers v. HudsonSearch
-
is in no way limited to controversial topics or emotionally Page 500 U. S. 522 charged issues, see Winters v. NewSearch
-
compelled speech is the discussion of governmental affairs, which is at the core of our First Amendment freedoms, Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
constitutes membership in the state and national parent organizations. See 643 F.Supp. at 1308. See also Cumero v. PublicSearch
-
the union bears the burden of proving the proportion of chargeable expenses to total expenses. Chicago Teachers v. HudsonSearch
-
kind and effect. We long have recognized the important political and expressive nature of litigation. See, e.g., NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
be served by compelling objecting employees to subsidize activity that the State has chosen to disallow. See Male v. GrandSearch
-
in a strike. 643 F.Supp. at 1312. The Court of Appeals properly reviewed this finding for clear error. See Anderson v. BessemerSearch
-
The union may properly charge petitioners for those costs. v. TheSearch
-
Lehnert v. FerrisSearch
-
refer to negotiation and administration as the touchstones for determining chargeability. See, e.g., Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
Abood v. DetroitSearch
-
at 466 U. S. 456 . In reaching a contrary conclusion, the principal opinion relies principally on Wooley v. MaynardSearch
-
citizens to withhold their share of payments for activities that Congress has approved. See, e.g., United States v. LeeSearch
-
as that concept has evolved in the relevant cases. See, e.g., NAACP v. ButtonSearch
-
of whether the District Court erred in finding that all of the litigation articles were chargeable. See Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
United States v. HastingSearch
-
The principal opinion also appears to rely on Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
of union dues, we have focused narrowly upon the union's role as an exclusive bargaining agent. In Railway Employees v. HansonSearch
-
U. S. 740 , 367 U. S. 787 (1961) (Black, J., dissenting) (emphasis added). In Abood v. DetroitSearch
-
Id. at 367 U. S. 768 . Our analysis in Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
Id. at 466 U. S. 453 . Most recently, in Communications Workers v. BeckSearch
-
unit litigation, at Part IV-B, and of conventions, at Part IV-E, JUSTICE BLACKMUN places unfounded reliance upon Ellis v. RailwaySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lehnert v. FerrisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial