Citation network
Clark Vs. Roemer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 646 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. RoemerSearch
-
U.S. 646 (1991) Clark v. RoemerSearch
-
valid objections. Section 5 requires preclearance. Without it, a voting change will not be effective as law, Connor v. WallerSearch
-
U. S. 656 , and is unenforceable, Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
are entitled to an injunction prohibiting a State from implementing changes that have not been precleared, Allen v. StateSearch
-
applied to judges in 1986, Haith v. MartinSearch
-
Court's decisions dealing with the ex post question whether to set aside illegal elections, see, e.g., Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
was not cured by the Attorney General's preclearance of later, or related, voting changes. McCain v. LybrandSearch
-
of the Voting Rights Act. League of the United Latin American Citizens Council No. 444 v. ClementsSearch
-
in part and enjoined the elections for the judgeships that the District Court conceded were uncleared. Clark v. RoemerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
pursuant to one of these two methods. Connor v. WallerSearch
-
U. S. 656 (1975) (per curiam). See also United States v. BoardSearch
-
plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction prohibiting the State from implementing the changes. Allen v. StateSearch
-
to judges was uncertain until our summary affirmance in Brooks v. GeorgiaSearch
-
State Board of Elections, 775 F.Supp. 1470, aff'd, 498 U.S. 916 (1990). But in Haith v. MartinSearch
-
a number of our decisions, including Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
U. S. 379 (1971), NAACP v. HamptonSearch
-
County Election Commission, 470 U. S. 166 (1985), Berry v. DolesSearch
-
U. S. 190 (1978), and Georgia v. UnitedSearch
-
for preclearance, United States v. SheffieldSearch
-
even though the Attorney General now objects to the earlier changes. This ruling conflicts with our decision in McCain v. LybrandSearch
-
U.S. at 457 U. S. 270 , quoting Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. RoemerSearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
Haith v. MartinSearch
-
United States v. BoardSearch
-
Brooks v. GeorgiaSearch
-
NAACP v. HamptonSearch
-
and Georgia v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SheffieldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial