Citation network
Chambers Vs. Nasco, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 06, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Chambers v. NascoSearch
-
Inc. - 501 U.S. 32 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Chambers v. NascoSearch
-
Inc., 501 U.S. 32 (1991) Chambers v. NascoSearch
-
prohibits the shifting of attorney's fees in most cases, see Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
U. S. 260 , as when the party practices a fraud upon the court, Universal Oil Products Co. v. RootSearch
-
U. S. 580 , or delays or disrupts the litigation or hampers a court order's enforcement, Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
be imposed, without specifying which sanction is required. Bank of Nova Scotia v. UnitedSearch
-
conduct cannot be made subservient to any state policy without transgressing the boundaries set out in Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 64 , Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
U. S. 99 , and Hanna v. PlumerSearch
-
NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
properties to a third person, Gray made no mention of the recordation of the deeds earlier that morning. NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
fine against Chambers personally. NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
La.1984). Two subsequent appeals from the contempt order were dismissed for lack of a final judgment. See NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
whether further sanctions should be imposed for the manner in which the litigation had been conducted. NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
Ibid. The Court of Appeals affirmed. NASCO, Inc. v. CalcasieuSearch
-
Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSearch
-
Link v. WabashSearch
-
Young v. UnitedSearch
-
to vacate its own judgment upon proof that a fraud has been perpetrated upon the court. See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-EmpireSearch
-
Universal Oil Products Co. v. RootSearch
-
court's inherent power. The court may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial. Illinois v. AllenSearch
-
U. S. 337 (1970). It may dismiss an action on grounds of forum non conveniens, Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSearch
-
of an assessment of attorney's fees is undoubtedly within a court's inherent power as well. Ibid. See also Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
prohibits fee-shifting in most cases. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
derives not from a court's power to control litigants, but from its historic equity jurisdiction, see Sprague v. TiconicSearch
-
Id. at 421 U. S. 258 (quoting Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. MaierSearch
-
court to impose as part of the fine attorney's fees representing the entire cost of the litigation. Toledo Scale Co. v. ComputingSearch
-
Alyeska, supra, 421 U.S. at 421 U. S. 258 -259 (quoting F.D. Rich Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. Industrial Lumber Co., 417 U. S. 116 , 417 U. S. 129 (1974)). See also Hall v. ColeSearch
-
Newman v. PiggieSearch
-
See Business Guides, Inc. v. ChromaticSearch
-
such as the scope of a court's inherent power. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSearch
-
and Rule 11, the other sanctioning mechanisms invoked by NASCO here. See Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
Zaldivar v. LosSearch
-
the many state court decisions sustaining such dismissals, but even from language in this Court's opinion in Redfield v. YstalyferaSearch
-
Thus, this case is distinguishable from Bank of Nova Scotia v. UnitedSearch
-
party in certain classes of litigation to recover fees. That was precisely the issue in People of Sioux County v. NationalSearch
-
Only when there is a conflict between state and federal substantive law are the concerns of Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
U. S. 64 (1938), at issue. As we explained in Hanna v. PlumerSearch
-
test of Erie and Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
of the court's orders and the attempt to defraud the court itself. In our recent decision in Business Guides, Inc. v. ChromaticSearch
-
Hall, 412 U.S. at 412 U. S. 4 -5. Cf. Pavelic & LeFlore v. MarvelSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial