Citation network
Peretz Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 501 U.S. 923 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991) Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Syllabus in Gomez V. UnitedSearch
-
preside at jury selection if he has raised no objection to the judge's absence. Cf. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
U. S. 833 , 478 U. S. 848 . Cf. also, e.g., United States v. GagnonSearch
-
whether to invoke a magistrate's assistance and whether to actually empanel the jury selected. See United States v. RaddatzSearch
-
In Gomez v. UnitedSearch
-
in Gomez required reversal. The Court of Appeals disagreed. Relying on its earlier decision in United States v. MusacchiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. VanwortSearch
-
F.2d 375, 382-383 (CA2 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Chapoteau v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MangSearch
-
United States v. Lopez-PenaSearch
-
Government of the Virginia Islands v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. FordSearch
-
United States v. WeySearch
-
of Appeals prompted us to grant the Government's petition for certiorari in the France case, see United States v. FranceSearch
-
U.S. 903 (1990). Earlier this Term, we affirmed that judgment by an equally divided Court, United States v. FranceSearch
-
decisions have continued to acknowledge the importance Congress placed on the magistrate's role. See, e.g., McCarthy v. BronsonSearch
-
actually intended to permit magistrates to take on a role that raised a substantial constitutional question. Cf. Rust v. SullivanSearch
-
does not apply when the defendant has not objected to the magistrate's conduct of the voir dire. See United States v. MusacchiaSearch
-
their personal right to have an Article III judge preside over a civil trial. See Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
The most basic rights of criminal defendants are similarly subject to waiver. See, e.g., United States v. GagnonSearch
-
Levine v. UnitedSearch
-
Segurola v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FigueroaSearch
-
United States v. BascaroSearch
-
F.2d 1335, 1365 (CA11 1984) (absence of objection is waiver of double jeopardy defense), cert. denied sub nom. Hobson v. UnitedSearch
-
to object constitutes waiver of Fifth Amendment claim), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 854 (1983). See generally Yakus v. UnitedSearch
-
to invoke the magistrate's assistance is made by the district court, subject to veto by the parties. See United States v. RaddatzSearch
-
for the purpose of emasculating' constitutional courts, National Insurance Co. v. TidewaterSearch
-
United States v. PeacockSearch
-
III therefore requires the same conclusion respecting the procedure followed in this case. Page 501 U. S. 940 V OurSearch
-
as to whether a district court may assign voir dire to a magistrate. Government of the Virginia Islands v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. FordSearch
-
United States v. DeFioreSearch
-
F.2d 757 (CA2 1983), cert. denied sub nom. Coppola v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. Rivera-SolaSearch
-
Haith v. UnitedSearch
-
In Gomez, we cited our opinion in Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
to protect 'the role of the independent judiciary within the constitutional scheme of tripartite government.' Thomas v. UnionSearch
-
claims decided before judges who are free from potential domination by other branches of government.' United States v. WillSearch
-
authorization in the statute reasonably should bear some relation to the specified duties. Thus, in United States v. RaddatzSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Peretz v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial