Citation network
Hafer Vs. Melo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 15, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 21 (1991) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Hafer V. MeloSearch
-
The District Court dismissed the latter claims under Will v. MichiganSearch
-
it in some capacity, 22 whether they act in accordance with their authority or misuse it. Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. In Will v. MichiganSearch
-
or her personal capacity. 912 F. 2d, at 635636. Several other Courts of Appeals adhere to this practice. See Con ner v. ReinhardSearch
-
Houston v. ReichSearch
-
Lundgren v. McDanielSearch
-
F.2d 600 , 603-604 (CAll 1987). Still others impose a more rigid pleading requirement. See Wells v. BrownSearch
-
Nix v. NormanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
II In Kentucky v. GrahamSearch
-
way of pleading an action against an entity of which an officer is an agent.''' Id., at 165 (quoting Monell v. NewSearch
-
defenses such as objectively reasonable reliance on existing law. Id., at 166-167. Our decision in Will v. MichiganSearch
-
when it seeks to do so. Will, supra, at 65 (quoting United States v. BassSearch
-
for actions they take in their official capacity. Although one Court of Appeals has endorsed this view, see Cowan v. UniversitySearch
-
U. S. 232 , 243 (1974) (quoting Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
requirement. Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
seeking absolute immunity must show that such immunity is justified for the governmental function at issue, Burns v. ReedSearch
-
State executive officials are not entitled to absolute immunity for their official actions. Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
employment decisions, even if the same official has absolute immunity when performing other functions. See Forrester v. WhiteSearch
-
supra (discharge of Air Force employee, allegedly orchestrated by senior White House aides) (action under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
To the extent that Hafer argues from the Eleventh Amendment itself, she makes a claim that failed in Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
But such concerns are properly addressed within the framework of our personal immunity jurisprudence. See Forrester v. WhiteSearch
-
Syllabus HAFER v. MELOSearch
-
Will v. MichiganSearch
-
of the Court. In Will v. MichiganSearch
-
See Wells v. BrownSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
Cowan v. UniversitySearch
-
Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
Burns v. ReedSearch
-
See Forrester v. WhiteSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Edelman v. JordanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial