Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Ibarra

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 16, 1991

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Healy US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1964
  2. United States Vs. Dieter US Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1976
  3. U.S. 1 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ibarra
    Search
  4. U.S. 1 (1991) United States v. Ibarra
    Search
  5. which began to run on the date of the initial order. The court also held that this Court's decisions in United States v. Healy
    Search
  6. and United States v. Dieter
    Search
  7. of its opinion, the Court of Appeals rejected the Government's argument that this Court's decisions in United States v. Healy
    Search
  8. U. S. 75 (1964), and United States v. Dieter
    Search
  9. U. S. 6 (1976) (per curiam), controlled the decision. In United States v. Healy
    Search
  10. effect in criminal cases. Id. at 376 U. S. 78 -79. More than 12 years later, we decided United States v. Dieter
    Search
  11. litigation are viewed with disfavor when filed before an appellate tribunal. Ibid. (citing United States v. Smith
    Search
  12. even though the latter court is in the course of considering a motion for rehearing of the order. Cf. United States v. Ladson
    Search
  13. Dieter, 429 U.S. at 429 U. S. 8 -9 (quoting Department of Banking of Neb. v. Pink
    Search
  14. is calculated by subtracting from the full limitations period whatever time ran before the clock was stopped. See Cada v. Baxter
    Search
  15. that would-be appellants are entitled to the full 30 days after a motion to reconsider has been decided. United States v. Dieter
    Search
  16. thus have no occasion to consider whether instances of bad faith might require a different result. See United States v. Healy
    Search
  17. to extend the time to appeal in cases in which successive motions for reconsideration are submitted. See United States v. Marsh
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ibarra
    Search
  19. and United States v. Dieter
    Search
  20. In United States v. Healy
    Search
  21. United States v. Smith
    Search
  22. Cf. United States v. Ladson
    Search
  23. Department of Banking of Neb. v. Pink
    Search
  24. See Cada v. Baxter
    Search
  25. See United States v. Healy
    Search
  26. See United States v. Marsh
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial