Citation network
Dawson Vs. Delaware
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 12, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 159 (1991) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Dawson V. DelawareSearch
-
at sentencing simply because those beliefs and associations are protected by the First Amendment. See, e. g., Barclay v. FloridaSearch
-
endorsed any unlawful or violent acts. Thus, it was not relevant to help prove any aggravating circumstance. Cf. Texas v. JohnsonSearch
-
character evidence, see Payne v. TennesseeSearch
-
protects an individual's right to join groups and associate with others holding similar beliefs. See Aptheker v. SecretarySearch
-
to that association at his penalty hearing violated his constitutional rights. Relying on our statement in Zant v. StephensSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Williams v. NewSearch
-
of racial intolerance and subversive advocacy where such evidence was relevant to the issues involved. In Barclay v. FloridaSearch
-
id., at 970, and n. 18 (STEVENS, J., concurring in judgment). One year later, in United States v. AbelSearch
-
Brotherhood evidence in this case, because the evidence proved nothing more than Dawson's abstract beliefs. Cf. Texas v. JohnsonSearch
-
to introduce any relevant mitigating evidence that he proffers in support of a sentence less than death. Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
sort of relevant mitigating evidence, the State is entitled to rebut that evidence with proof of its own. See Payne v. TennesseeSearch
-
required by the State to practice law. Schware v. BoardSearch
-
associational rights if there is no connection between the information sought and the State's interest. Bates v. LittleSearch
-
at this time, and we therefore leave it open for consideration by the Supreme Court of Delaware on remand. See Clemons v. MississippiSearch
-
has declined to apply harmlesserror analysis to certain categories of constitutional error. See, e. g., Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
a substantial argument that harmless-error analysis is not appropriate for the type of error before us today. See Rose v. ClarkSearch
-
of the other organizations to which Dawson belonged, such as Alcoholics Anonymous or the Green Tree Program. Cf. Jones v. HamelmanSearch
-
David K. v. LaneSearch
-
prison gang conveyed additional information about Dawson's character. In Barclay v. FloridaSearch
-
Skipper v. SouthSearch
-
United States v. FountainSearch
-
United States v. SilversteinSearch
-
the nature of prison gangs generally. 174 itself is an indication of future dangerousness, see Franklin v. LynaughSearch
-
of the defendant himself. See Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
U. S. 302 , 328 (1989) (quoting California v. BrownSearch
-
Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
a standard easy for defendants to satisfy, but difficult for prosecutors. Under Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
U. S. 104 (1982), and Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
comparable evidence regarding their religious practice and fraternal organizations. See, e. g., Jordan 175 v. StateSearch
-
Sivak v. StateSearch
-
Deputy v. StateSearch
-
People v. BelmontesSearch
-
Evans v. McCotterSearch
-
State v. BeukeSearch
-
a bad one. The jury could not have assessed Dawson's overall character without both. Just last Term, in Payne v. TennesseeSearch
-
U. S. 808 (1991), the Court condemned a similar distortion. Overruling Booth v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 496 (1987), and South Carolina v. GathersSearch
-
that the Constitution permits courts and juries to consider character evidence in sentencing proceedings. See Williams v. NewSearch
-
Id., at 250, n. 15. More recently, in Franklin v. LynaughSearch
-
Syllabus Dawson V. DelawareSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial