Citation network
United States Vs. Fordice
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 13, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 717 (1991) October Term, 1991 Syllabus United States V. FordSearch
-
Despite this Court's decisions in Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 347 U. S. 483 (Brown I), and Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of programs, and funding. Its conclusions of law included rulings that, based on its interpretation of Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
Together with No. 90-6588, Ayers et al. v. FordiceSearch
-
educated separately and has established racially neutral policies not animated by a discriminatory purpose. Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
The proper inquiry asks whether existing racial identifiability is attributable to the State, see, e. g., Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
its former segregation in any facet of its system, see, e. g., Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSearch
-
separate but equal''' has no place in the field of public education. Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ayers v. AllainSearch
-
black student was not admitted to the University of Mississippi until 1962, and then only by court order. See Meredith v. FairSearch
-
Alcorn State, and Mississippi Valley State, where the racial composition ranged from 92 to 99 percent black. Ayers v. AllainSearch
-
schools also governs in the higher education context, the court observed that there was disagreement whether Green v. SchoolSearch
-
F. Supp., at 1552. Relying on a Fifth Circuit three-judge court decision, Alabama State Teachers Assn. (ASTA) v. AlabamaSearch
-
curiam affirmance of that case, 393 U. S. 400 (1969), and its understanding of our later decision in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
at 1564. The Court of Appeals reheard the action en banc and affirmed the decision of the District Court. Ayers v. AllainSearch
-
system. If the State has not discharged this duty, it remains in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown v. BoardSearch
-
we have consistently asked whether existing racial identifiability is attributable to the State, see, e. g., Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
Gilmore v. CitySearch
-
jure segregation in any facet of its institutional system. See, e. g., Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSearch
-
Swann v. CharlotteMecklenburgSearch
-
Green v. SchoolSearch
-
neutral policies and free choice were not enough to dismantle a dual system of primary or secondary schools, Green v. SchoolSearch
-
from lower levels of schools, 914 F. 2d, at 686, sufficiently so that our decision in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
Hawkins v. BoardSearch
-
disagree with respondents that the Court of Appeals and District Court properly relied on our decision in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
id., at 63, would seemingly compel remedies akin to those upheld in Green v. SchoolSearch
-
such identifiability. 5 Similarly, reliance on our per curiam affirmance in Alabama State Teachers Assn. v. AlabamaSearch
-
a new violation of the Fourteenth Amendment under traditional principles. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSearch
-
Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
however, that the relevant agency and the courts had specifically found no violation of the regulation in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
reach of Title VI's protection extends no further than the Fourteenth Amendment. See Regents of Univ. of California v. BakkeSearch
-
see also Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
more institutions would decrease the discriminatory effects of the present system, see, e. g., United States v. LouisianaSearch
-
in order to create an environment free of racial discrimination and to make aggrieved individuals whole. See Brown v. BoardSearch
-
lost educational and career opportunities and stigmatic harms caused by discriminatory educational systems, see Brown v. BoardSearch
-
McLaurin v. OklahomaSearch
-
to eliminate policies and practices traceable to de jure segregation, Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
to emphasize that this standard is far different from the one adopted to govern the grade-school context in Green v. SchoolSearch
-
caused by intentional state action during the prior de jure era. See, e. g., Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. BrinkmanSearch
-
Keyes v. SchoolSearch
-
facially neutral assignment policies, in order to eliminate or decrease observed racial imbalances. See, e. g., Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. FordSearch
-
(Brown I), and Brown v. BoardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial