Citation network
Estelle Vs. Mcguire
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 04, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 62 (1991) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Estelle, Warden V. McguireSearch
-
it is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions. Lewis v. JeffersSearch
-
have concluded that it, read in the context of other instructions, authorized the use of propensity evidence. Boyde v. CaliforniaSearch
-
or serious injuries by nonaccidental means. People v. BledsoeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
see also Pulley v. HarrisSearch
-
People v. BledsoeSearch
-
Landeros v. FloodSearch
-
People v. JacksonSearch
-
Because the prosecution had 2 In this regard, we observe that the Ninth Circuit reached a similar result in Blair v. McCarthySearch
-
of Appeals based its grant of habeas relief solely on a violation of state law that prejudiced the defendant. Blair v. McCarthySearch
-
Mathews v. UnitedSearch
-
trial. We hold that McGuire's due process rights were not violated by the admission of the evidence. See Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
italics was omitted from the actual jury instruction given at McGuire's trial). 72 relief. See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
see also Henderson v. KibbeSearch
-
but must be considered in the context of the instructions as a whole and the trial record. Cupp v. NaughtenSearch
-
that violates the Constitution. Boyde v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 370 , 380 (1990).4 And we also bear 4 We acknowledge that language in the later cases of Cage v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 39 (1990), and Yates v. EvattSearch
-
Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
and reaffirm the standard set out in Boyde. 74 finding by a preponderance of the evidence. Cf. People v. SimonSearch
-
Huddleston v. UnitedSearch
-
and his wife, because they were the only two people regularly caring for Tori during her short life. See People v. JacksonSearch
-
in the context of other instructions, authorized the use of propensity evidence 75 pure and simple. Boyde v. CaliforniaSearch
-
see also Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSearch
-
ante, at 68 (quoting People v. JacksonSearch
-
the Due Process Clause if they relieve the State of the burden of persuasion on an element of the offense. Patterson v. NewSearch
-
the jury that the suggested conclusion should be inferred based on the predicate facts proved. Ulster County Court v. AllenSearch
-
Syllabus Estelle, Warden V. McguireSearch
-
Boyde v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Pulley v. HarrisSearch
-
Blair v. McCarthySearch
-
See Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
See Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
the Constitution. Boyde v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Cage v. LouisianaSearch
-
and Yates v. EvattSearch
-
Cf. People v. SimonSearch
-
See People v. JacksonSearch
-
Patterson v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial