Citation network
Arkansas Vs. Oklahoma
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 11, 1991
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 91 (1991) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Arkansas Et Al. V. OklahomaSearch
-
Environmental Protection Agency v. OklahomaSearch
-
Act. Pp.98-114. (a) Where interstate discharge is involved, both federal common law of nuisance, Milwaukee v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 304 , and an affected State's common law, International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSearch
-
factual findings when the ALJ's findings were supported by substantial evidence. See generally Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
reverse. II Interstate waters have been a font of controversy since the founding of the Nation. E. g., Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
-
This Court has frequently resolved disputes between States that are separated by a common river, see, e. g., Ohio v. KentuckySearch
-
U. S. 335 (1980), that border the same body of water, see, e. g., New York v. NewSearch
-
Jersey, 256 U. S. 296 (1921), or that are fed by the same river basin, see, e. g., New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
between a State that introduces pollutants to a waterway and a downstream State that objects. See, e. g., Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
of common law tempered by a respect for the sovereignty of the States. Compare id., at 521, with Georgia v. TennesseeSearch
-
Illinois v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Id., at 107. In Milwaukee v. IllinoisSearch
-
cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1196 (1985). This Court subsequently endorsed that analysis in International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to be a reasonable exercise of the Agency's substantial statutory discretion. Cf. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 , 842845 (1984). V TheSearch
-
EPA's reasonable, consistently held interpretation of those standards is entitled to substantial deference. Cf. INS v. NationalSearch
-
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
if those findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See generally Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. StateSearch
-
Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
Syllabus Arkansas Et Al. V. OklahomaSearch
-
Environmental Protection Agency v. OklahomaSearch
-
Milwaukee v. IllinoisSearch
-
International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSearch
-
Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
Ohio v. KentuckySearch
-
New York v. NewSearch
-
New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
Georgia v. TennesseeSearch
-
In Milwaukee v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cf. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Cf. INS v. NationalSearch
-
Gibbons v. OgdenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial