Citation network
New York Vs. Harris
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 14 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court New York v. HarrisSearch
-
U.S. 14 (1990) New York v. HarrisSearch
-
he signed a written inculpatory statement. The New York trial court suppressed the first statement under Payton v. NewSearch
-
degree murder. The Appellate Division affirmed, but the State Court of Appeals reversed. Applying the rule of Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
where its officers have violated the law must bear some relation to the purposes which the law serves. United States v. CeccoliniSearch
-
protection for statements made outside their premises where the police have probable cause to make an arrest. Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
therefore, his subsequent statement was not an exploitation of the illegal entry into his home. Cf. United States v. CrewsSearch
-
suppressed because the police, by entering Harris' home without a warrant and without his consent, violated Payton v. NewSearch
-
and that the warrantless arrest therefore violated Payton even though there was probable cause. Applying Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
arrest in a public place was permissible as long as the arresting officer had probable cause, see United States v. WatsonSearch
-
here that Harris was immune from prosecution because his person was the fruit of an illegal arrest. United States v. CrewsSearch
-
made by him after proper warnings would no doubt be admissible. This case is therefore different from Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 590 (1975), Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U. S. 200 (1979), and Taylor v. AlabamaSearch
-
should be suppressed when they bear a sufficiently close relationship to the underlying illegality. See also Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
n cases such as Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
it the fruit of having been arrested in the home rather than someplace else. The case is analogous to United States v. CrewsSearch
-
the product of coercion, if Miranda warnings were not given, or if there was a violation of the rule of Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
and exigent circumstances did not exist. An arrest in such circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment. See Payton v. NewSearch
-
s exclusionary rule is to eliminate incentives for police officers to violate that Amendment. See, e.g., United States v. LeonSearch
-
Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 487 U. S. 533 , 487 U. S. 536 -537 (1988) (citing Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Wong Sun, supra, at 371 U. S. 488 (quoting J. Maguire, Evidence of Guilt, 221 (1959)). Accord, Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
Taylor v. AlabamaSearch
-
the illegal arrest and Harris' confession, without any intervening factor other than the warnings required by Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Brown, supra, 422 U.S. at 422 U. S. 603 (citing Westover v. UnitedSearch
-
States, decided with Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
U.S. at 445 U. S. 589 -590 (ellipses in original) (quoting Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 365 U. S. 505 , 365 U. S. 511 (1961)). See also California v. CiraoloSearch
-
the statement. The only Supreme Court case in which the majority even attempts to find support is United States v. CrewsSearch
-
objectively reasonable reliance on a facially valid warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. United States v. LeonSearch
-
may not question a suspect in the absence of an attorney once such an accusatory instrument has been filed. People v. SamuelsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New York v. HarrisSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
of Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Cf. United States v. CrewsSearch
-
Applying Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
and Taylor v. AlabamaSearch
-
Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
of Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment. See Payton v. NewSearch
-
Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
Accord, Brown v. IllinoisSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial