Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sullivan Vs. Everhart

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1990

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 8 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Califano Vs. Yamasaki US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979
  2. Batterton Vs. Francis US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1977
  3. Mathews Vs. Eldridge US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1976
  4. ins Vs. Cardoza-fonseca US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1987
  5. Mead Corp. Vs. Tilley US Supreme Court · Jun 05, 1989
  6. United States Vs. Burchard US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1888
  7. Fcc Vs. Schreiber US Supreme Court · May 24, 1965
  8. Colautti Vs. Franklin US Supreme Court · Jan 09, 1979
  9. U.S. 83 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Sullivan v. Everhart
    Search
  10. U.S. 83 (1990) Sullivan v. Everhart
    Search
  11. if such adjustment or recovery would defeat the Act's purposes or be against equity and good conscience. Califano v. Yamasaki
    Search
  12. Courts of Appeals had upheld the netting regulations against similar attacks. Id. at 1536-1537 (citing Lugo v. Schweicker
    Search
  13. F.2d 1143 (CA3 1985), and Webb v. Bowen
    Search
  14. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  15. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier
    Search
  16. Mead Corp. v. Tilley
    Search
  17. NLRB v. United
    Search
  18. U. S. 123 (1987). These principles apply fully to the Secretary's administration of the Act. See Schweiker v Gray
    Search
  19. New International Dictionary 27, 1898 (1981) (hereinafter Webster's)), and general legal usage ( e.g., United States v. Burchard
    Search
  20. this provision is observed in good faith -- as we must presume, in this facial challenge, it will be. See, e.g., FCC v. Schreiber
    Search
  21. regulations violate due process, and we will not address that claim in the first instance. See, e.g., United States v. Sperry
    Search
  22. assert rights designed to protect specially disadvantaged beneficiaries. Respondents, like the plaintiffs in Califano v. Yamasaki
    Search
  23. between overpayments and underpayments. Everhart v. Bowen
    Search
  24. Lugo v. Schweiker
    Search
  25. care. Affidavit of Emil Zwiezen, reproduced in Brief for Appellee in No. 87-1839 (CA10), p. 31A. See also Everhart v. Bowen
    Search
  26. that we must nevertheless defer to his interpretation of the statute. Relying heavily upon Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  27. Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts
    Search
  28. U. S. 158 , 492 U. S. 171 (1989). See also Dole v. United
    Search
  29. U. S. 421 , 480 U. S. 445 -450 (1987). Indeed, Califano v. Yamasaki
    Search
  30. would be strong evidence that the Secretary's procedures are inconsistent with the statute. See, e.g., Colautti v. Franklin
    Search
  31. It is, of course, of no importance that Yamasaki predates Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Sullivan v. Everhart
    Search
  33. Lugo v. Schweicker
    Search
  34. and Webb v. Bowen
    Search
  35. of the Act. See Schweiker v. Gray
    Search
  36. United States v. Sperry
    Search
  37. Everhart v. Bowen
    Search
  38. Dole v. United
    Search
  39. Indeed, Califano v. Yamasaki
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial