Citation network
Baltimore City Dss Vs. Bouknight
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 549 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Baltimore City DSS v. BouknightSearch
-
U.S. 549 (1990) Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSearch
-
of complying may testify to the existence, possession, or authenticity of the thing produced. See, e.g., United States v. DoeSearch
-
to effect the State's public purposes unrelated to the enforcement of its criminal laws, see, e.g., California v. ByersSearch
-
control over items that are the legitimate object of the government's noncriminal regulatory powers, cf. Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
aspects of her act of production directly or indirectly in any subsequent criminal proceedings. See, e.g., Braswell v. UnitedSearch
-
Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
Doe v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DoeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
regime constructed to effect the State's public purposes unrelated to the enforcement of its criminal laws. In Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 335 U. S. 17 -18 (quoting Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 390 U. S. 39 , 390 U. S. 57 (1968) (quoting Albertson v. SubversiveSearch
-
Grosso v. UnitedSearch
-
Haynes v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 390 U. S. 85 , 390 U. S. 98 -99 (1968). California v. ByersSearch
-
ibid. (quoting Albertson v. SubversiveSearch
-
U.S. at 382 U. S. 79 ), and required disclosure of no inherently illegal activity. See also United States v. SullivanSearch
-
object of the government's noncriminal regulatory powers, the ability to invoke the privilege is reduced. In Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 221 U. S. 382 . See also Braswell v. UnitedSearch
-
Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
Maurice in a manner consonant with the State's regulatory interests and subject to inspection by BCDSS. Cf. Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
Marchetti, 390 U.S. at 390 U. S. 57 (quoting Albertson v. PageSearch
-
Maryland Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene v. PrinceSearch
-
Leary v. UnitedSearch
-
of contexts, the Fifth Amendment limits prosecutors' ability to use testimony that has been compelled. See Simmons v. UnitedSearch
-
Murphy v. WaterfrontSearch
-
Adams v. MarylandSearch
-
New Jersey v. PortashSearch
-
Garrity v. NewSearch
-
would be testimonial because it would amount to an admission of Bouknight's physical control over her son. See Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
acts of production are testimonial if they contain implicit statement of fact). Accord, United States v. DoeSearch
-
threat of self-incrimination. Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
a collective entity, unlike a natural person, has no Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See Hale v. HenkelSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
producing documents that may incriminate the entity, even if the documents may also incriminate the custodian. Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
not primarily intended to facilitate criminal investigations, and they target the general public. See California v. ByersSearch
-
Marchetti, 390 U.S. at 57 (quoting Albertson v. SubversiveSearch
-
is often obtained through civil proceedings and the subsequent protective oversight by BCDSS. See, e.g., Lee v. StateSearch
-
Hoffman v. UnitedSearch
-
in Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 335 U. S. 33 (quoting Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 328 U. S. 582 , 328 U. S. 589 -590 (1946)). See also Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Baltimore City DSS v. BouknightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial