Citation network
James Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 307 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court James v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 307 (1990) James v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 392 U. S. 12 (1968), quoting Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Harris v. NewSearch
-
of impeaching the credibility of the defendant's own testimony. This Court first recognized this exception in Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 347 U. S. 65 . In Harns v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
York, supra, and Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Finally, in United States v. HavensSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Illinois v. KrullSearch
-
becoming parties to the constitutional violation by admitting illegally obtained evidence at trial. See United States v. LeonSearch
-
See Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Walder v. UnitedSearch
-
Chambers v. MississippiSearch
-
from impeaching own witness after witness offered incriminating testimony violated due process). See also Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
decide whether there is a salient distinction between direct and cross-examination in this context, cf. United States v. HavensSearch
-
other important values outweighs any deterrence of unlawful conduct that the rule might achieve. See, e.g., Illinois v. KrullSearch
-
would be excluded. The principle applies to suppressed physical evidence, as in Walder itself and United States v. HavensSearch
-
and to statements obtained in violation of the law, so long as the statements are voluntary and reliable, see Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Ante at 493 U. S. 312 , n. 1 (quoting Illinois v. KrullSearch
-
ante at 493 U. S. 320 -321 (opinion of STEVENS, J.), is not realistic. See generally Dunn v. UnitedSearch
-
proof requirement applies in Illinois and other States, making perjury convictions difficult to sustain. See People v. AlkireSearch
-
People v. HarrodSearch
-
possibility insufficient to justify immunity for a defendant's own false testimony on cross-examination. United States v. HavensSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court James v. IllinoisSearch
-
Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
In Harns v. NewSearch
-
and Oregon v. HassSearch
-
Illinois v. KrullSearch
-
See United States v. LeonSearch
-
and United States v. HavensSearch
-
Dunn v. UnitedSearch
-
See People v. AlkireSearch
-
Chambers v. MississippiSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial