Citation network
Lewis Vs. Continental Bank Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Lewis v. ContinentalSearch
-
Bank Corp. - 494 U.S. 472 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Lewis v. ContinentalSearch
-
Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472 (1990) Lewis v. ContinentalSearch
-
by reason of the inherently short duration of the opportunity for remedy, is likely to evade review. See Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
is remanded for consideration of such materials as the parties may submit to supplement the record. See Diffenderfer v. CentralSearch
-
See Rhodes v. StewartSearch
-
the case to the District Court for an explanation of why that claim had been denied. Continental Illinois Corp. v. LewisSearch
-
Article III of the Constitution, federal courts may adjudicate only actual, ongoing cases or controversies. Deakins v. MonaghanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision, Allen v. WrightSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. HaworthSearch
-
of the lawsuit, Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
U. S. 95 , 461 U. S. 101 (1983) (quoting Baker v. CarrSearch
-
against the application of the statutes to uninsured ISBs, Golden v. ZwicklerSearch
-
over the constitutionality of such application, Thomas v. UnionSearch
-
Agricultural Products Co., 473 U. S. 568 , 473 U. S. 580 (1985) (quoting Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. GardnerSearch
-
Aetna Life Insurance Co. Page 494 U. S. 480 v. HaworthSearch
-
by winning the relief it seeks, see Rhodes v. StewartSearch
-
to create an Article III case or controversy where none exists on the merits of the underlying claim, see Diamond v. CharlesSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
U. S. 478 , 455 U. S. 482 (1982) (per curiam) (quoting Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
course, it intends to establish an uninsured ISB, which does not appear on this record. Cf. California Coastal Comm'n v. GraniteSearch
-
Press-Enterprise Co. v. SuperiorSearch
-
Burlington Northern R. Co. v. MaintenanceSearch
-
of a case that has become moot on appeal is to vacate the judgment with directions to dismiss. See, e.g., Deakins v. MonaghanSearch
-
United States v. MunsingwearSearch
-
in which the parties may, if necessary, amend their pleadings or develop the record more fully. See Diffenderfer v. CentralSearch
-
but before the losing party could challenge its validity on appeal is a question of some difficulty, see, e.g., Palmer v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lewis v. ContinentalSearch
-
See Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
See Diffenderfer v. CentralSearch
-
Continental Illinois Corp. v. LewisSearch
-
Allen v. WrightSearch
-
Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. HaworthSearch
-
Baker v. CarrSearch
-
ISBs, Golden v. ZwicklerSearch
-
Thomas v. UnionSearch
-
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. GardnerSearch
-
Rhodes v. StewartSearch
-
Cf. California Coastal Comm'n v. GraniteSearch
-
Burlington Northern R. Co. v. MaintenanceSearch
-
Palmer v. ChicagoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial