Citation network
Butler Vs. Mckellar
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 407 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Butler v. McKellarSearch
-
U.S. 407 (1990) Butler v. McKellarSearch
-
relief, which was dismissed by the District Court. The Court of Appeals affirmed, rejecting his argument that Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
questioning once an accused invokes his right to counsel on any offense. Subsequently, this Court handed down Arizona v. RobersonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
time the defendant's conviction became final, and is therefore inapplicable to cases on collateral review under Teague v. LaneSearch
-
U. S. 288 , and Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
attacked his conviction by way of a petition for federal habeas corpus. Butler relied on our decision in Arizona v. RobersonSearch
-
unless the decision was dictated by precedent existing at the time the petitioner's conviction became final. Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
for the first time that he was a suspect in Lane's murder. After receiving Miranda warnings, see Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
the commission of a rape. The Supreme Court of South Carolina upheld Butler's conviction on direct appeal, State v. ButlerSearch
-
Subsequently, Butler unsuccessfully petitioned for collateral relief in the State's courts, see Butler v. StateSearch
-
motion for summary judgment. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, see Butler v. AikenSearch
-
F.2d 255 (1988), Page 494 U. S. 411 Butler argued that Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
to counsel on any offense. In support of his argument, Butler relied principally on United States ex rel. Espinoza v. FairmanSearch
-
by our subsequent decision in Roberson, Butler v. AikenSearch
-
s petition for a rehearing en banc. We granted certiorari, 490 U.S. 1045, and now affirm. Last Term, in Penry v. LynaughSearch
-
U.S. at 492 U. S. 313 (citing Teague v. LaneSearch
-
to Page 494 U. S. 414 then-existing constitutional standards. Furthermore, as we recognized in Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
proceeding, new constitutional commands.' . . . See also Brown v. AllenSearch
-
precedents made by state courts even though they are shown to be contrary to later decisions. Cf. United States v. LeonSearch
-
U.S. at 401 U. S. 693 (Harlan, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part) (quoting Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
with whom Justice BLACKMUN and Justice STEVENS join as to Parts I, II, and III, dissenting. Last Term in Teague v. LaneSearch
-
Id. at 489 U. S. 306 (quoting Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
rejections of constitutional challenges is made manifest by the Court's conclusion that our recent holding in Arizona v. RobersonSearch
-
U. S. 436 , 384 U. S. 475 (1966). In Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
emphasis added) (quoting Solem v. StumesSearch
-
Kaufman v. UnitedSearch
-
liberty interests through a fresh and full review of their claims by an Article III court. As we recognized in Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
death sentence. I adhere to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment. Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
could reach different results about the application of Edwards v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 477 (1981), to the fact pattern in Arizona v. RobersonSearch
-
See Saffle v. ParksSearch
-
the deterrent function of the exclusionary rule, see ante at 494 U. S. 414 (referencing United States v. LeonSearch
-
Compare Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
narrow federal constitutional protections in order to advance the State's interest in law enforcement. See, e.g., Reed v. RossSearch
-
Cf. Brown v. AllenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial