Citation network
Lytle Vs. Household Mfg., Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 20, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Lytle v. HouseholdSearch
-
Mfg., Inc. - 494 U.S. 545 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Lytle v. HouseholdSearch
-
Mfg., Inc., 494 U.S. 545 (1990) Lytle v. HouseholdSearch
-
he would have been entitled to a jury trial on all issues common to them and his Title VII equitable claims, Curtis v. LoetherSearch
-
have been required to resolve the legal claims before the court considered the equitable claims, Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSearch
-
U. S. 469 , 369 U. S. 473 . The holding in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSearch
-
rather than to accord the trial court's factual findings collateral estoppel effect. See, e.g., Granfinanciera, S. A. v. NordbergSearch
-
p. 494 U. S. 556 . JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSearch
-
claims, Lytle would have been entitled to a jury trial on those claims. See Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 500 , 359 U. S. 510 -511 (1959) (footnote omitted). Accord, Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSearch
-
because Lytle was required to join his legal and equitable claims to avoid the bar of res judicata. See Harnett v. BillmanSearch
-
determinations. Instead, we have reversed and remanded each case in its entirety for a trial before a jury. See Meeker v. AmbassadorSearch
-
Tull v. UnitedSearch
-
from multiple lawsuits and the possibility of inconsistent decisions, and it conserves judicial resources. Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
which a trial court erroneously concludes that a claim is equitable, rather than legal, see, e.g., Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSearch
-
or that resolution of an equitable claim can precede resolution of a legal claim, see, e.g., Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSearch
-
the court does not weigh the evidence, but draws all factual inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
long recognized, a jury and a judge can draw different conclusions from the same evidence. See, e.g., 84 U. S. v. StoutSearch
-
Under Fourth Circuit precedent, a plaintiff does not have a right to a jury trial on a Title VII claim. See Keller v. PrinceSearch
-
whether a plaintiff seeking relief under Title VII has a right to a jury trial. See Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers v. TerrySearch
-
to apply collateral estoppel in this situation directly conflicts with the Seventh Circuit's decision in Hussein v. OshkoshSearch
-
claims in light of this Court's decision in Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
Washington v. YakimaSearch
-
court determinations is not a sensible exercise of this Court's discretion. See Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. UniversitySearch
-
U. S. 883 , 467 U. S. 896 , n. 7 (1984). Cf. Piccirillo v. NewSearch
-
Moreover, vacating the District Court's judgment avoids the possibility of inconsistent determinations. See Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Ante at 494 U. S. 548 . As Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
This Court's usual practice is to decline to address questions raised for the first time here. See United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lytle v. HouseholdSearch
-
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSearch
-
of the Court. In Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSearch
-
See Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
Accord, Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSearch
-
See Harnett v. BillmanSearch
-
See Meeker v. AmbassadorSearch
-
Montana v. UnitedSearch
-
Anderson v. LibertySearch
-
U. S. v. StoutSearch
-
See Keller v. PrinceSearch
-
See Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers v. TerrySearch
-
Hussein v. OshkoshSearch
-
Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
See Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. UniversitySearch
-
Cf. Piccirillo v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial