Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nlrb Vs. CurtIn Matheson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 17, 1990

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 62 unlinked
Show
  1. NLRB v. Curtin
    Search
  2. Matheson - 494 U.S. 775 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Curtin
    Search
  3. Matheson, 494 U.S. 775 (1990) National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin
    Search
  4. Page 494 U. S. 778 presumption of majority support for one year. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  5. R.B. 944 (1974), rev'd and remanded on other grounds sub nom. Page 494 U. S. 780 Teamsters Local Union 769 v. NLRB
    Search
  6. Corp., 227 N.L.R.B. 397 (1976), review denied sub nom. New York Printing Pressmen & Offset Workers Union, No. 51 v. NLRB
    Search
  7. NLRB has the primary responsibility for developing and applying national labor policy. See, e.g., Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB
    Search
  8. NLRB v. Erie
    Search
  9. NLRB v. Truck
    Search
  10. Beth Israel Hospital, supra, at 437 U. S. 500 -501 (quoting Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  11. Finishing Corp. v. Page
    Search
  12. NLRB v. Iron
    Search
  13. even if we would have formulated a different rule had we sat on the Board, Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  14. heat of the strike on herself and her family, is forced to abandon the picket line and go back to work. Cf. Lyng v. Automobile
    Search
  15. that would return the strikers to their jobs, thereby displacing some or all of the replacements. See Belknap, Inc. v. Hale
    Search
  16. replacement workers logically will depend on the union's bargaining power. Under this Court's decision in NLRB v. Mackay
    Search
  17. Fall River, 482 U.S. at 482 U. S. 38 (quoting Brooks v. NLRB
    Search
  18. Ibid. (citing Brooks v. NLRB
    Search
  19. the bargaining relationship serves the policies of promoting industrial stability and negotiated settlements. Cf. NLRB v. Erie
    Search
  20. NLRB v. Insurance
    Search
  21. or that may impair employees' right to engage in concerted activity. See, e.g., Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service v. NLRB
    Search
  22. NLRB v. Great
    Search
  23. we must determine whether the Board's refusal to adopt the presumption is rational and consistent with the Act. NLRB v. Baptist
    Search
  24. quoting Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB
    Search
  25. Board had applied the contrary presumption rather than its present no-presumption approach. Soule Glass & Glazing Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  26. National Car Rental System, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  27. have rejected the antiunion presumption in cases in which the Board had applied its prounion presumption. NLRB v. Windham
    Search
  28. NLRB v. Pennco
    Search
  29. has not expressly rejected the antiunion presumption, but has approved the Board's no-presumption approach. See NLRB v. Buckley
    Search
  30. has never expressly considered the validity of the good faith doubt standard. Cf. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  31. of the standard, and resolution of the issue is not necessary to our decision. See United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell
    Search
  32. See Belknap, Inc. v. Hale
    Search
  33. See Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F.C
    Search
  34. express statements of individual workers, the employer is placed in a difficult bind. See Mingtree Restaurant, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  35. as opposed to the union in reversing Board findings of no reasonable, good faith doubt. See Soule Glass & Glazing Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  36. NLRB v. Randle-Eastern
    Search
  37. we cannot make that yet-to-be-made decision on the agency's behalf, but must remand so that the Board may do so. SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  38. of the federal government -- to make almost all its policy through adjudication. It is entitled to do that, see NLRB v. Bell
    Search
  39. Address before Federal Bar Association, February 12, 1931, quoted by Frank, J. in United States v. Forness
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Curtin
    Search
  41. National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin
    Search
  42. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  43. Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB
    Search
  44. Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  45. See Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Page
    Search
  46. the Board, Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  47. Cf. Lyng v. Automobile
    Search
  48. NLRB v. Mackay
    Search
  49. Brooks v. NLRB
    Search
  50. Cf. NLRB v. Erie
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial