Citation network
Venegas Vs. Mitchell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 82 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Venegas v. MitchellSearch
-
U.S. 82 (1990) Venegas v. MitchellSearch
-
eligible for fees, has recognized that it is the party's right to waive, settle, or negotiate that eligibility, Evans v. JeffSearch
-
and has implicitly accepted that statutory fee awards can coexist with private fee arrangements, cf. Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
a waiver of their causes of action with their adversaries than a fee with their own attorneys. The fact that Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
contingent fee model to the lodestar model of hours reasonably expended compensated at reasonable rates. See Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
Riverside v. RiveraSearch
-
from the lodestar figure based on the contingency of nonrecovery in this particular litigation. See Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
other way. Section 1988 makes the prevailing party eligible for a discretionary award of attorney's fees. Evans v. JeffSearch
-
litigation, either because they were fortunate enough to be able to retain counsel on a fee-paying basis, Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
U. S. 94 -95, or because they were represented free of charge by nonprofit legal aid organizations, Blum v. StensonSearch
-
is concerned, it is the party's right to waive, settle, or negotiate that eligibility. See Evans v. JeffSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Newton v. RumerySearch
-
of being more free to negotiate with their adversaries than with their own attorneys. Relying heavily on Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
award belongs to the attorney, rather than the plaintiff. See Evans v. JeffSearch
-
Sullivan v. CrownSearch
-
Wilmington v. J.LSearch
-
Venegas v. SkaggsSearch
-
award places a ceiling on an attorney's permissible recovery under a contingent fee agreement. Cooper v. SingerSearch
-
Venegas v. WagnerSearch
-
The Court of Appeals subsequently affirmed the judgment. Venegas v. WagnerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Venegas v. MitchellSearch
-
Evans v. JeffSearch
-
See Blanchard v. BergeronSearch
-
See Pennsylvania v. DelawareSearch
-
See Evans v. JeffSearch
-
Cooper v. SingerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial