Citation network
Missouri Vs. Jenkins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 33 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
U.S. 33 (1990) Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
did not abuse its discretion in ruling that KCMSD should be responsible for funding its share of the remedy. Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
III. A court can direct a local government body to levy Page 495 U. S. 36 its own taxes. See, e.g., Griffin v. PrinceSearch
-
that requires local governments to do more than exercise the power that is theirs has been rejected, Von Hoffman v. CitySearch
-
The District Court realigned KCMSD as a party defendant, School Dist. of Kansas City v. MissouriSearch
-
the District Court found that KCMSD and the State had operated a segregated school system within the KCMSD. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
necessary to eliminate the vestiges of segregation and the financing necessary to implement those remedies. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
for an increase in taxes sufficient to pay for its share of the desegregation remedy in following years. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
the Eighth Circuit affirmed the District Court's findings of liability and remedial order in most respects. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
cost equally between the State and KCMSD. Id. at 685. We denied certiorari. Kansas City, Missouri, School Dist. v. MissouriSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
by the doctrine of comparative fault in tort, which had been adopted by the Missouri Supreme Court in Gustafson v. BendaSearch
-
id. at 412 (quoting Griffin v. PrinceSearch
-
lacks the judicial power to order a tax increase. The Court of Appeals agreed with the District Court that Griffin v. PrinceSearch
-
the entry of the Court of Appeals' judgment, we must dismiss the petition. Since Department of Banking of Nebraska v. PinkSearch
-
to be reviewed. Cf. Zimmern v. UnitedSearch
-
Leishman v. AssociatedSearch
-
a suggestion for rehearing in banc, even without the order contemplated by Rule 41(a), and point us to United States v. SamuelsSearch
-
court granted rehearing or amended its order solely for the purpose of extending that time. Cf. Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-IllinoisSearch
-
Conboy v. FirstSearch
-
Credit Co. v. ArkansasSearch
-
how styled, as containing both petitions for panel rehearing and suggestions for rehearing in banc. Cf. Gonzalez v. SouthernSearch
-
for solutions to the problems of segregation upon those who have themselves created the problems. As Brown v. BoardSearch
-
the problems of desegregation. See also Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 411 U. S. 42 (1973) (quoting Jefferson v. HackneySearch
-
U. S. 546 -547 (1972)). By no means should a district court grant local government carte blanche, cf. Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
least have the opportunity to devise their own solutions to these problems. Cf. Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSearch
-
not have allowed the tax increase to stand, and should have reversed the District Court in this respect. See Langnes v. GreenSearch
-
approving or disapproving, the Court of Appeals' conclusion that the District Court's remedy was proper. See Cone v. WestSearch
-
have been delayed if the State resisted efforts by KCMSD to obtain contribution. It is true that, in Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
the remedy if it can, and apportionment of the cost is part of the equitable power of the District Court. Cf. Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
Pennsylvania v. UnionSearch
-
court to disestablish local government institutions that interfere with its commands. Cf. New York City Bd of Estimate v. MorrisSearch
-
body to levy its own taxes is plainly a judicial act within the power of a federal court. We held as much in Griffin v. PrinceSearch
-
governmental bodies to levy taxes adequate to satisfy their debt obligations. See, e.g., Louisiana ex rel. Hubert v. MayorSearch
-
Wolff v. NewSearch
-
United States v. NewSearch
-
Heine v. LeveeSearch
-
Von Hoffman v. CitySearch
-
We disagree. This argument was rejected as early as Von Hoffman v. CitySearch
-
North Carolina State Bd of Education v. SwannSearch
-
This litigation has come to us once before, on the collateral issue of attorney's fees. Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
and child development programs. The cost of these remedies was to be borne equally by the State and KCMSD. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial