Citation network
Ngiraingas Vs. Sanchez
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 24, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 182 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Ngiraingas v. SanchezSearch
-
U.S. 182 (1990) Ngiraingas v. SanchezSearch
-
Page 495 U. S. 183 Amendment, and could not have been persons acting under color of state law. Cf. Will v. MichiganSearch
-
We seek, therefore, indicia of congressional intent at the time the statute was enacted. See District of Columbia v. CarterSearch
-
United States v. PriceSearch
-
footnote omitted). Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
U. S. 167 , 365 U. S. 174 (1961) (overruled in certain other respects by Monell v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
interpretation than what a majority of the Court found significant in Will v. MichiganSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
to avoid giving a congressional enactment the broad scope its language and origins may require, United States v. PriceSearch
-
Nevertheless, the court held that the defendant officers were entitled to invoke qualified immunity under Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
See Frett v. GovernmentSearch
-
as any other governmental entity). See also Fleming v. DepartmentSearch
-
See Cong.Globe, 42d Cong., 1st Sess., 244. See also Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
This reasoning is fully consistent with the Court's decision in Monell v. NewSearch
-
Ante at 495 U. S. 187 . The Court's review, however, is incomplete. Our decision in District of Columbia v. CarterSearch
-
Id. at 409 U. S. 430 -431, quoting Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSearch
-
Examining Board v. FloresSearch
-
in the Territories. Because few measures are more effective than suing the government directly for damages, see Owen v. CitySearch
-
Finley v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 490 U. S. 545 , 490 U. S. 554 (1989) quoting Anderson v. PacificSearch
-
Will v. MichiganSearch
-
Quern v. JordanSearch
-
of state sovereign immunity against actions in federal court -- a view I do not accept, see Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSearch
-
Grafton v. UnitedSearch
-
over the Territories. Simms v. SimmsSearch
-
Binns v. UnitedSearch
-
Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints v. UnitedSearch
-
National Bank v. CountySearch
-
See also Sere v. PitotSearch
-
Whatever limits the Constitution imposes on the exercise of federal power in the Territories, see United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSearch
-
Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSearch
-
sovereign immunity does not protect against liability under the laws of a superior governmental authority. See Owen v. CitySearch
-
retain common law sovereign immunity against claims raised in its own courts under its own local laws, see Puerto Rico v. ShellSearch
-
Porto Rico v. RosalySearch
-
quoting United States v. MauriceSearch
-
Cotton v. UnitedSearch
-
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. WoodwardSearch
-
The immunity conferred by the 1950 Act corresponded to the common law notion of sovereign immunity. See Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSearch
-
a result flatly inconsistent with any view of the statute. See Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. FloresSearch
-
Cases cited by respondents as evidence of territorial immunity, such as Wisconsin v. DotySearch
-
Langford v. KingSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial