Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Delo Vs. Stokes

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 11, 1990

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 2 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Barefoot Vs. Estelle US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1983
  2. Woodard Vs. Hutchins US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1984
  3. U.S. 320 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Delo v. Stokes
    Search
  4. U.S. 320 (1990) Delo v. Stokes
    Search
  5. murder in 1979 and sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Missouri Supreme Court. State v. Stokes
    Search
  6. filed three separate petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in the federal courts, each of which was denied. See Stokes v. Armontrout
    Search
  7. Stokes v. Armontrout
    Search
  8. included offense instructions in capital murder cases warrant the imposition of a stay of execution. See Williams v. Armontrout
    Search
  9. Stokes v. Delo
    Search
  10. cites dissenting opinions filed in the Missouri Supreme Court in 1983 to support his contention. See, e.g., State v. Holland
    Search
  11. See Maxwell v. Bishop
    Search
  12. Wainwright v. Adams
    Search
  13. Sanders v. United
    Search
  14. States, 373 U. S. 1 , 373 U. S. 18 -19 (1963). See also Wainwright v. Booker
    Search
  15. Court's order sound and responsible. The Court of Appeals similarly is due considerable deference. See Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  16. O'Connor v. Board
    Search
  17. the merits of Mr. Stokes' claim. Rather, they in effect have held his case in abeyance pending resolution of Williams v. Armontrout
    Search
  18. en banc, is reviewing a panel decision that the selective application by Missouri courts of the decision in State v. Baker
    Search
  19. one depends on an inquiry into existing precedents. Cf. Butler v. McKellar
    Search
  20. of error, Page 495 U. S. 327 the Court's rush to judgment is unseemly and indefensible. See Woodard v. Hutchins
    Search
  21. Rosenberg v. United
    Search
  22. penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Delo v. Stokes
    Search
  24. the Missouri Supreme Court. State v. Stokes
    Search
  25. See Stokes v. Armontrout
    Search
  26. See Williams v. Armontrout
    Search
  27. State v. Holland
    Search
  28. Wainwright v. Booker
    Search
  29. See Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  30. of Williams v. Armontrout
    Search
  31. State v. Baker
    Search
  32. Cf. Butler v. McKellar
    Search
  33. See Woodard v. Hutchins
    Search
  34. the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales