Citation network
United Steelworkers Vs. Rawson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 362 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court United Steelworkers v. RawsonSearch
-
U.S. 362 (1990) United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSearch
-
that respondents' negligence claim was not preempted. Distinguishing this Court's decision in Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSearch
-
the State Supreme Court's judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Electrical Workers v. HechlerSearch
-
id. at 163a. The Supreme Court of Idaho reversed. Dunbar v. UnitedSearch
-
J., specially concurring). Page 495 U. S. 366 We denied the Union's petition for certiorari. Steelworkers v. DunbarSearch
-
that respondents had stated a valid claim under Idaho law that was not preempted by federal labor law. Rawson v. UnitedSearch
-
of America, 111 Idaho 630, 726 P.2d 742 (1986). Distinguishing this Court's decision in Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSearch
-
at 745. The Union again petitioned for certiorari. While that petition was pending, we decided Electrical Workers v. HechlerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the Supreme Court of Idaho, and remanded this case for further consideration in light of Hechler. Steelworkers v. RawsonSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
have concurrent jurisdiction over controversies involving collective bargaining agreements, Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySearch
-
U. S. 502 (1962), state courts must apply federal law in deciding those claims, Teamsters v. LucasSearch
-
Avco Corp. v. MachinistsSearch
-
extends beyond state law contract actions. In Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSearch
-
S. 211 . We extended this rule of preemption to a tort suit by an employee against her union in Electrical Workers v. HechlerSearch
-
today. The Union's duty of fair representation arises from the National Labor Relations Act itself. See Breininger v. SheetSearch
-
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSearch
-
at one time it may have appeared most unlikely that unions would be called upon to assume such duties, see Humphrey v. MooreSearch
-
Electrical Workers v. HechlerSearch
-
United Mine Workers Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSearch
-
H.K. Porter Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
U. S. 99 , 397 U. S. 106 -108 (1970). Our decision in Electrical Workers v. HechlerSearch
-
an intent to create obligations enforceable against the union by the individual employees. Cf. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSearch
-
interpretation, respondents have no claim, for with exceptions under federal labor law not relevant here, see Lewis v. BenedictSearch
-
collective bargaining agreement relied on by respondents are not promises by the Union to the employer. Cf. Teamsters v. LucasSearch
-
arbitrary and capricious fashion in failing to exercise its duties under the collective bargaining agreement. Cf. Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
argument on our decisions in Lingle v. NorgeSearch
-
and Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSearch
-
Rawson v. UnitedSearch
-
As in Lingle v. NorgeSearch
-
them. Because we have no basis for disputing the construction of state law by a state supreme court, see Clemons v. MississippiSearch
-
Glanzer v. ShepardSearch
-
relies, embodies this principle and long has guided the interpretation of Idaho tort law. See, e.g., Steiner Corp. v. AmericanSearch
-
S.H. Kress & Co. v. GodmanSearch
-
Page 495 U. S. 381 Fagundes v. StateSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
a) of the NLRA in Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSearch
-
U. S. 96 , 375 U. S. 104 (1963). Our decision in Farmer v. CarpentersSearch
-
id. at 430 U. S. 299 (quoting Allen-Bradley Local v. WisconsinSearch
-
regulatory scheme. State courts long have held unions liable for personal injuries under state law. See, e.g., DiLuzio v. UnitedSearch
-
Brawner v. SandersSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United Steelworkers v. RawsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial