Citation network
California Vs. Ferc
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 21, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 490 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court California v. FERCSearch
-
U.S. 490 (1990) California v. FederalSearch
-
a veto power over federal projects inconsistent with the FPA, as interpreted in First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. FPCSearch
-
has been endorsed, see FPC v. OregonSearch
-
and federal authorities over the same subject matter. Pp. 495 U. S. 500 -503. (c) Although California v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 495 U. S. 496 projects inconsistent with the FPA, as interpreted in First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. FPCSearch
-
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed FERC's order denying rehearing. California ex rel. State Water Resources Board v. FERCSearch
-
California v. ARCSearch
-
America Corp., 490 U. S. 93 , 490 U. S. 101 (1989), quoting Rice v. SantaSearch
-
California v. UnitedSearch
-
Fullerton v. StateSearch
-
California Trout, Inc. v. StateSearch
-
Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
FPC v. OregonSearch
-
FPC v. NiagaraSearch
-
with approval in a range of decisions, both addressing the FPA and in other contexts. See, e.g., New England Power Co. v. NewSearch
-
City of Tacoma v. TaxpayersSearch
-
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. StateSearch
-
Square D Co. v. NiagaraSearch
-
quoting Burnet v. CoronadoSearch
-
be limited correspondingly. Petitioner also argues that our decision in California v. UnitedSearch
-
that this Court in California v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 495 U. S. 504 California v. UnitedSearch
-
Iowa, but that decision bears quite indirectly, at best, upon interpretation of the FPA. The Court in California v. UnitedSearch
-
with congressional directives, governing use of water employed in federal reclamation projects. California v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra. Also, as in First Iowa, the Court in California v. UnitedSearch
-
ed.), and California v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 438 U. S. 650 , 438 U. S. 664 -665, 438 U. S. 674 -675. Although California v. UnitedSearch
-
Given these differences between the statutes and saving provisions, it should come as no surprise that California v. UnitedSearch
-
or to First Iowa. Since the Court decided California v. UnitedSearch
-
New England Power Co., 455 U.S. at 455 U. S. 338 , n. 6. We do not believe that California v. UnitedSearch
-
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGeeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California v. FERCSearch
-
California v. FederalSearch
-
Although California v. UnitedSearch
-
State Water Resources Board v. FERCSearch
-
Rice v. SantaSearch
-
California v. UnitedSearch
-
Fullerton v. StateSearch
-
California Trout, Inc. v. StateSearch
-
FPC v. NiagaraSearch
-
New England Power Co. v. NewSearch
-
Square D Co. v. NiagaraSearch
-
Burnet v. CoronadoSearch
-
and California v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial