Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Davis Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 21, 1990

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

40 entries 5 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Blanset Vs. Cardin US Supreme Court · May 16, 1921
  2. United States Vs. Mendenhall US Supreme Court · May 27, 1980
  3. United States Vs. Bowling US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1921
  4. Bartels Vs. Birmingham US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1947
  5. Delta Air Lines, Inc. Vs. August US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1981
  6. Davis v. United
    Search
  7. States - 495 U.S. 472 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. United
    Search
  8. States, 495 U.S. 472 (1990) Davis v. United
    Search
  9. The Court of Appeals reasoned that the beneficiary of a charitable contribution must be indefinite, see Russell v. Allen
    Search
  10. performed the charitable service. Id. at 564. Because the Court of Appeals' decision conflicted with White v. United
    Search
  11. States, 725 F.2d 1269, 1270-1272 (CA10 1984), and Brinley v. Commissioner
    Search
  12. were frequently used in describing trust arrangements. See, e.g., United States v. Bowling
    Search
  13. Rand v. United
    Search
  14. I.T. 3707, 1945 Cum.Bull. 114. Numerous judicial decisions have relied on this interpretation. See, e.g., Rockefeller v. Commissioner
    Search
  15. Orr v. United
    Search
  16. Thomason v. Commissioner
    Search
  17. Danz v. Commissioner
    Search
  18. indicates its apparent satisfaction with the prevailing interpretation of the statute. See Cammarano v. United
    Search
  19. McCaughn v. Hershey
    Search
  20. Bob Jones University v. United
    Search
  21. with the discretion to select among a number of qualified donees to whom the funds may be disbursed. See, e.g., Bowman v. Commissioner
    Search
  22. Although the Service's interpretive rulings do not have the force and effect of regulations, see Bartels v. Birmingham
    Search
  23. construction of a statute and where they have been in long use. See, e.g., Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United
    Search
  24. to the contrary, a taxpayer ordinarily reports his own income and takes his own deductions. See, e.g., Commissioner v. Culbertson
    Search
  25. New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  26. Brinley v. Commissioner
    Search
  27. of third parties who assisted the taxpayers in rendering services to qualified organizations. See, e.g., Rockefeller v. Commissioner
    Search
  28. McCollum v. Commissioner
    Search
  29. Smith v. Commissioner
    Search
  30. raised before nor decided by the Court of Appeals, we decline to address it here. See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August
    Search
  31. The Commissioner has adopted the holding in Rockefeller v. Commissioner
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Davis v. United
    Search
  33. Russell v. Allen
    Search
  34. White v. United
    Search
  35. and Brinley v. Commissioner
    Search
  36. Rockefeller v. Commissioner
    Search
  37. See Cammarano v. United
    Search
  38. Bowman v. Commissioner
    Search
  39. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United
    Search
  40. Commissioner v. Culbertson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial