Citation network
Taylor Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 495 U.S. 575 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
have some uniform definition independent of the labels used by the various States' criminal codes. Cf. United States v. NardelloSearch
-
his sentence. 864 F.2d 625, 627 (1989). The majority relied on their court's earlier decision in United States v. PortwoodSearch
-
the criminal codes of the States define burglary in many different ways. See United States v. HillSearch
-
roughly corresponding to the definitions of burglary in a majority of the States' criminal codes. See United States v. HillSearch
-
the omission of a preexisting definition of a term often indicates Congress' intent to reject that definition, see INS v. Cardoza-FonsecaSearch
-
Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ChatmanSearch
-
United States v. LeonardSearch
-
in a way that leads to odd results of this kind. See Dickerson v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
relying on the maxim that a statutory term is generally presumed to have its common law meaning. See Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
when that meaning is obsolete or inconsistent with the statute's purpose. Page 495 U. S. 595 In Perrin v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 49. Similarly, in United States v. NardelloSearch
-
Id. at 393 U. S. 296 . See also Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
that criminal statutes, including sentencing provisions, are to be construed in favor of the accused. See Bifulco v. UnitedSearch
-
Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
interpretation of a statute, nor one at odds with the generally accepted contemporary meaning of a term. See Perrin v. UnitedSearch
-
definitions of the prior offenses, and not to the particular facts underlying those convictions. See United States v. ChatmanSearch
-
United States v. HeadspethSearch
-
United States v. VidaureSearch
-
United States v. SherbondySearch
-
United States v. LeonardSearch
-
United States v. TaylorSearch
-
United States v. DombrowskiSearch
-
United States v. HillSearch
-
and United States v. PattersonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. NardelloSearch
-
United States v. PortwoodSearch
-
See United States v. HillSearch
-
See Dickerson v. NewSearch
-
See Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
In Perrin v. UnitedSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
See Bifulco v. UnitedSearch
-
See Perrin v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. ChatmanSearch
-
United States v. PalmerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial