Citation network
Demosthenes Vs. Baal
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 731 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Demosthenes v. BaalSearch
-
U.S. 731 (1990) Demosthenes v. BaalSearch
-
postconviction relief was fairly supported by the record and, thus, is binding on a federal habeas court, see Maggio v. FulfordSearch
-
to enter a guilty plea and that it was error not to conduct a competency hearing prior to accepting his pleas. Baal v. StateSearch
-
Baal was aware of his impending execution and of the reason for it, and thus was sane under the test set forth in Ford v. WainwrightSearch
-
denied petitioners' application for stay of execution, holding that, under this Court's recent decision in Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
is entitled to a presumption of correctness upon federal habeas review. Dissent at 6, 7. II In Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
Rosenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
have held that a state court's conclusion regarding a defendant's competency is entitled to such a presumption. Maggio v. FulfordSearch
-
Marshall v. LonbergerSearch
-
Baal v. GodinezSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Petition for Habeas Corpus, No. 90-243, Exhibit D (emphasis added). Cf. Rees v. PeytonSearch
-
Order, Baal v. GodinezSearch
-
of incompetency, Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
as the state court did, it had even less reason to overturn what is essentially a factual determination. See Maggio v. FulfordSearch
-
discretion of judges who are much Page 495 U. S. 738 more familiar with the cases than we are. See Delo v. StokesSearch
-
emphasis added). The Court recognizes that this case requires application of our recent decision in Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
s allegations, if proven true, would entitle him to relief under the appropriate legal standard. See Townsend v. SainSearch
-
for competence to waive federal habeas corpus review of a death sentence is the same as that announced in Rees v. PeytonSearch
-
Order in Baal v. GodinezSearch
-
hearing one week ago and determined that Mr. Baal was competent offers no support for the Court's action today. Maggio v. FulfordSearch
-
is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Demosthenes v. BaalSearch
-
Baal v. StateSearch
-
Ford v. WainwrightSearch
-
Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
II In Whitmore v. ArkansasSearch
-
Rosenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Rees v. PeytonSearch
-
See Maggio v. FulfordSearch
-
See Delo v. StokesSearch
-
See Townsend v. SainSearch
-
the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial