Citation network
Wilder Vs. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
Hosp. Ass'n - 496 U.S. 498 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
Hosp. Ass'n, 496 U.S. 498 (1990) Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
s meaning, or (2) Congress has foreclosed such enforcement of the statute in the enactment itself. Wright v. RoanokeSearch
-
are the intended beneficiaries of the Amendment, See Golden State Transit Page 496 U. S. 499 Corp. v. LosSearch
-
on the States that gives rise to enforceable rights, see Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
suits, see Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. NationalSearch
-
for the enforcement of those rights. 868 F.2d 653, 656-660 (1989). We granted certiorari. Virginia Hospital Assn. v. BalilesSearch
-
of the United States. In Maine v. ThiboutotSearch
-
Wright v. RoanokeSearch
-
Golden State Transit Corp. v. LosSearch
-
certain kind of conduct rather than a binding obligation on the governmental unit, Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySearch
-
Secretary. We decline to adopt an interpretation of the Boren Amendment that would render it a dead letter. See Rosado v. WymanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wright, 479 U.S. at 479 U. S. 423 -424 (quoting Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. NationalSearch
-
See 453 U.S. at 453 U. S. 13 . Similarly in Smith v. RobinsonSearch
-
See Patsy v. BoardSearch
-
on grounds of collateral estoppel. 1 Record, Exhs. 20 and 21. The Court of Appeals reversed. Virginia Hospital Assn. v. BalilesSearch
-
on the ground that the suit seeks only prospective injunctive relief against state officials. Virginia Hospital Assn. v. BalilesSearch
-
We previously granted certiorari to decide this issue in Coos Bay Center v. OregonSearch
-
than that involved in determining whether a private right of action can be implied from a particular statute. See Cort v. AshSearch
-
for the violation of statutory rights. See Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSearch
-
Touche Ross v. RedingtonSearch
-
Congress rather than the courts controls the availability of remedies for violations of statutes. See e.g., Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
-
Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. SeaSearch
-
of federal statutory rights only when Congress has affirmatively withdrawn the remedy. See Golden State Transit Corp. v. CitySearch
-
Alabama Nursing Home Assn. v. HarrisSearch
-
California Hospital Assn. v. ObledoSearch
-
Minnesota Assn. of Health Care Facilities v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Hospital Assn. of New York State, Inc. v. ToiaSearch
-
Massachusetts General Hospital v. WeinerSearch
-
St. Mary's Hospital of East St Louis, Inc. v. OgilvieSearch
-
Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc., Div. of St. Mary's Hospital v. RockefellerSearch
-
app. dism'd, 400 U.S. 931 (1970). Cf. National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, RWDSU, AFL-CIO v. CareySearch
-
by health care providers. See AMISUB (PSL) Inc. v. ColoradoSearch
-
Nebraska Health Care Assn., Inc. v. DunningSearch
-
See Hoodkroft Convalescent Center Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Colorado Health Care Assn. v. ColoradoSearch
-
Hillhaven Corp. v. WisconsinSearch
-
Alabama Hospital Assn. v. BeasleySearch
-
Mississippi Hospital Assn., Inc. v. HecklerSearch
-
Charleston Memorial Hospital v. ConradSearch
-
Washington Health Facilities Assn. v. WashingtonSearch
-
in Wright, which vested the Housing Authority substantial discretion for setting utility allowances. See Wright v. RoanokeSearch
-
Wisconsin Hospital Ass'n v. ReivitzSearch
-
See Wright, supra, 479 U.S. at 479 U. S. 429 . See generally Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial