Citation network
Sullivan Vs. Finkelstein
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 617 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
U.S. 617 (1990) Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
S. 619 final judgment and remanding, but specifically provides that it may do both. Finally, language in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
a)(1) (1989). Cf. Heckler v. CampbellSearch
-
that a court's decision reviewing agency action could operate as law of the case and res judicata. Cf. City of Tacoma v. TaxpayersSearch
-
Cf. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MackeySearch
-
Finally, respondent argues that we already decided last Term, in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
though the district court action was filed by the agency, not someone seeking judicial review, e.g., United States v. AlconSearch
-
may seek to appeal on the ground that broader relief should have been granted by the district court, e.g., Rohms v. GardnerSearch
-
Caulder v. BowenSearch
-
Borders v. HecklerSearch
-
Newhouse v. HecklerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Booz v. SecretarySearch
-
Dorsey v. HecklerSearch
-
Cagle v. CalifanoSearch
-
Godsey v. BowenSearch
-
See Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. WetzelSearch
-
aside all the usual difficulties inherent in relying on subsequent legislative history, see, e.g, United States v. MineSearch
-
a petition for attorney's fees under EAJA, not appealability. Second, the committee relied in particular on Guthrie v. SchweikerSearch
-
far from clear that Guthrie did not involve a sixth-sentence remand. Guthrie, in turn, relied on Gilcrist v. SchweikerSearch
-
it is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine enunciated in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
adopted by the great majority of the Courts of Appeals, and I am in agreement with their conclusions. See, e.g., Colon v. SecretarySearch
-
Doughty v. BowenSearch
-
Huie v. BowenSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
Cf. Heckler v. CampbellSearch
-
Cf. City of Tacoma v. TaxpayersSearch
-
United States v. AlconSearch
-
Rohms v. GardnerSearch
-
Caulder v. BowenSearch
-
United States v. MineSearch
-
Guthrie v. SchweikerSearch
-
Gilcrist v. SchweikerSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Colon v. SecretarySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial