Citation network
illinois Vs. Rodriguez
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1990
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 177 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. RodriguezSearch
-
U.S. 177 (1990) Illinois v. RodriguezSearch
-
over respondent's apartment, as is required under United States v. MatlockSearch
-
its decision rests on an adequate and independent state ground, it is subject to review by this Court. See Michigan v. LongSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
entry without further inquiry is unlawful unless authority actually exists. But if so, the search is valid. Stoner v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 189 . Page 497 U. S. 179 Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In United States v. MatlockSearch
-
the warrantless entry of a person's home, whether to make an arrest or to search for specific objects. Payton v. NewSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
in which voluntary consent has been obtained, either from the individual whose property is searched, see Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
U. S. 218 (1973), or from a third party who possesses common authority over the premises, see United States v. MatlockSearch
-
is clearly based on state law that is both adequate and independent, we will not review the decision. Michigan v. LongSearch
-
error with respect to those factual judgments that law enforcement officials are expected to make. In Maryland v. GarrisonSearch
-
requires factual accuracy. A warrant is not needed, for example, where the search is incident to an arrest. In Hill v. CaliforniaSearch
-
that they always be correct, but that they always be reasonable. Page 497 U. S. 186 As we put it in Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
reasonably (though erroneously) believe they are in pursuit of a violent felon who is about to escape. See Archibald v. MoselSearch
-
Page 497 U. S. 187 Stoner v. CaliforniaSearch
-
is Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
which is all that the Constitution forbids. See Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
voluntarily limit his expectation of privacy by allowing others to exercise authority over his possessions. Cf. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
individual's reasonable expectation of privacy and, to that extent, limits his Fourth Amendment protections. Cf. Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
The baseline for the reasonableness of a search or seizure in the home is the presence of a warrant. Skinner v. RailwaySearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
law enforcement goals. Mincey v. ArizonaSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Those exceptions must be crafted in light of the warrant requirement's purposes. As this Court stated in McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
Mincey, supra, 437 U.S. at 437 U. S. 393 (citing United States v. ChadwickSearch
-
Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
the Constitution demands that the warrant procedure be observed. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. MatlockSearch
-
Frazier v. CuppSearch
-
warrantless intrusion into his home as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This conclusion flows directly from Stoner v. CaliforniaSearch
-
searches are generally reasonable. The cases the majority cites thus provide no support for its holding. In Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 497 U. S. 197 The majority's reliance on Maryland v. GarrisonSearch
-
The same analysis applies to Hill v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Id. at 401 U. S. 802 (brackets in original) (quoting People v. HillSearch
-
Given that the Court decided Hill before the extension of the warrant requirement to arrests in the home, Payton v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. RodriguezSearch
-
Court. See Michigan v. LongSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial