Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Milkovich Vs. LoraIn Journal

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 21, 1990

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

61 entries 7 linked 54 unlinked
Show
  1. Letter Carriers Vs. Austin US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1974
  2. Rosenblatt Vs. Baer US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1966
  3. Hustler Magazine, Inc. Vs. Falwell US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1988
  4. Ollman Vs. Evans US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1985
  5. Towne Vs. Eisner US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1918
  6. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  7. Rosenbloom Vs. Metromedia US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1971
  8. Milkovich v. Lorain
    Search
  9. Journal - 497 U.S. 1 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Milkovich v. Lorain
    Search
  10. Journal, 497 U.S. 1 (1990) Milkovich v. Lorain
    Search
  11. limiting the application of state defamation laws. While the Amendment does limit such application, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  12. on matters of public concern must be provable as false before liability can be assessed, Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps
    Search
  13. as stating actual facts about an individual are protected, see, e.g., Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler
    Search
  14. in dictum in Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  15. concept, see Abrams v. United
    Search
  16. See Milkovich v. The
    Search
  17. as required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  18. reversed and remanded, holding that there was sufficient evidence of actual malice to go to the jury. See Milkovich v. The
    Search
  19. this Court denied certiorari. 449 U. S. 966 (1980). On remand, relying in part on our decision in Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  20. petitioner was neither a public figure nor a public official under the relevant decisions of this Court. See Milkovich v. News-Herald
    Search
  21. Scott v. News-Herald
    Search
  22. are fact or opinion was set forth in the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Ollman v. Evans
    Search
  23. Milkovich v. News-Herald
    Search
  24. Gertz Page 497 U. S. 13 v. Robert
    Search
  25. redress injury to citizens wrought by invidious or irresponsible speech. In 1964, we decided in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  26. Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  27. New York Times, supra, 376 U.S. at 376 U. S. 279 ). Three years later, in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
    Search
  28. s defamation actions involving statements of public concern. Although the issue was initially in doubt, see Rosenbloom v. Metromedia
    Search
  29. was inappropriate for a private person attempting to prove he was defamed on matters of public interest. Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  30. Still later, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps
    Search
  31. of speech which may be the subject of state defamation actions. In Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler
    Search
  32. Id. at 398 U. S. 13 -14. See also Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell
    Search
  33. Bose Corp. v. Consumers
    Search
  34. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton
    Search
  35. Cianci v. New
    Search
  36. decision in Scott, supra. First, respondents claim that the determination by the Ohio Supreme Court in Milkovich v. News-Herald
    Search
  37. Thus, since petitioner has failed to establish actual malice, his action is precluded under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  38. U. S. 254 (1964), and Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
    Search
  39. Scott, 25 Ohio St.3d at 247, 496 N.E.2d at 704 (quoting Milkovich v. Lorain
    Search
  40. the proceedings in Scott, and thus would not be bound by anything in that ruling under Ohio law. See Hainbuchner v. Miner
    Search
  41. of the Ohio Supreme Court in Milkovich presumably continues to be law of the case on that issue. See Hawley v. Ritley
    Search
  42. case even if petitioner were regarded as a private figure, and thus the action is precluded by our decision in Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  43. thereby precluding federal review under Michigan v. Long
    Search
  44. has been construed to protect published opinions ever since the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Gertz v. Robert
    Search
  45. entirely correctly. I agree with the Court that under our line of cases culminating in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps
    Search
  46. to have said. See ante at 497 U. S. 16 -17 (discussing Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler
    Search
  47. and the broader social circumstances in which the statement was made. See, e.g., Potomac Valve & Fitting Inc. v. Crawford
    Search
  48. Janklow v. Newsweek
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Milkovich v. Lorain
    Search
  50. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial