Citation network
John Doe Agcy. Vs. John Doe Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
John Doe Agcy. v. JohnSearch
-
Doe Corp. - 493 U.S. 146 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court John Doe Agcy. v. JohnSearch
-
Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 (1989) John Doe Agency v. JohnSearch
-
Department of Air Force v. RoseSearch
-
NLRB v. RobbinsSearch
-
Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U. S. 214 , 437 U. S. 242 (1978). See also United States Department of Justice v. ReportersSearch
-
application. On more than one occasion, the Court has upheld the Government's invocation of FOIA exemptions. See EPA v. MinkSearch
-
H.R. Rep. No. 1497, 89th Cong., 2d Sess., 6 (1966), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1966, pp. 2418, 2423. See also EPA v. MinkSearch
-
See Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 437 U. S. 236 -239, 242 (STEVENS, J., concurring). See also United States v. WeberSearch
-
to cover documents already collected by the Government originally for non-law-enforcement purposes. See Gould Inc. v. GSASearch
-
at one time records and information that were generated on an earlier occasion and for a different purpose. See FBI v. AbramsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
nothing about limiting Exemption 7 to those documents originating as law enforcement records. A word as to FBI v. AbramsonSearch
-
requirements in determining whether the Government has properly invoked a particular exemption. See e.g., NLRB v. SearsSearch
-
Abramson, 456 U.S. at 456 U. S. 625 . See also Department of State v. WashingtonSearch
-
is a term derived from Vaughn v. RosenSearch
-
As to this conclusion, see also North v. WalshSearch
-
See New England Medical Center Hospital v. NLRBSearch
-
Gould Inc. v. GSASearch
-
Hatcher v. USPSSearch
-
Fedders Corp. v. FTCSearch
-
Gregory v. FDICSearch
-
F.Supp. 1329, 1333-1334 (DC 1979). See also Crowell & Moring v. DepartmentSearch
-
of the Government's claim that any compilation was not made solely in order to defeat the FOIA request. See Goldberg v. U.SSearch
-
Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
The cases were Weisberg v. U.SSearch
-
Aspin v. DepartmentSearch
-
Ditlow v. BrinegarSearch
-
and Center for National Policy Review on Race and Urban Issues v. WeinbergerSearch
-
General Dynamics Corp. v. DepartmentSearch
-
United States Department of Justice v. TaxSearch
-
United States Department of Justice v. ReportersSearch
-
United States Dept. of Justice v. JulianSearch
-
United States Dept. of Justice v. ReportersSearch
-
Federal Open Market Committee v. MerrillSearch
-
applicable, even after the FOIA request has been filed, by the mere act of classification. See, e.g., Goldberg v. DepartmentSearch
-
may include, I might note, not just criminal enforcement but civil and regulatory enforcement as well. See, e.g., Pope v. UnitedSearch
-
and the loose standard of relevance that will justify including material in the investigatory file. Compare Pratt v. WebsterSearch
-
Williams v. FBISearch
-
United States v. BiscegliaSearch
-
Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
requirement to Exemption 1 in order to eliminate the potential for similar abuse created by our decision in EPA v. MinkSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court John Doe Agcy. v. JohnSearch
-
John Doe Agency v. JohnSearch
-
See EPA v. MinkSearch
-
United States v. WeberSearch
-
See Gould Inc. v. GSASearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial