Citation network
U.S. Vs. Sperry Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. v. SperrySearch
-
Corp. - 493 U.S. 52 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. SperrySearch
-
Corp., 493 U.S. 52 (1989) United States v. SperrySearch
-
Sperry's prejudgment attachment was nullified by the Executive Orders implementing the Accords, since Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
Clause claims present nonjusticiable political questions is presently pending before the Court, see United States v. Munoz-FloresSearch
-
CFR 139 (1981). This Court upheld the revocation of the licenses and the suspension of the claims in Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
New York to the permanent physical occupation by the Government of private property which, this Court held in Loretto v. TeleprompterSearch
-
we held in Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
belies its express language before we conclude that the deductions are actually takings. Cf. Pittsburgh v. AlcoSearch
-
Massachusetts v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government has appropriated all, or most, of the award to itself and labeled the booty as a user fee. Cf. FCC v. FloridaSearch
-
Clyde Mallory Lines v. AlabamaSearch
-
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. R.ASearch
-
Gray & Co., 467 U. S. 717 , 467 U. S. 730 (1984) (quoting Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
entire class of persons that Congress rationally believes should bear them. Cf. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. R.ASearch
-
Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
classifications, so again our standard of review is that of rationality. See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
claims were small or uncertain of success from presenting them to the Tribunal. This case is wholly unlike Rinaldi v. YeagerSearch
-
to brief whether claims based on the Origination Clause present nonjusticiable political questions. See United States v. Munoz-FloresSearch
-
INS v. ChadhaSearch
-
this Court has on prior occasions appeared to address the merits of Origination Clause claims, see, e.g., Flint v. StoneSearch
-
before the effective date of Public Law 100-352. The appeal is therefore proper. See also Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSearch
-
Sperry's ability to pursue its claim against Iran in another forum distinguishes this case from Gray v. UnitedSearch
-
Sperry urges however, that American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSearch
-
Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. WashingtonSearch
-
has occurred. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSearch
-
In Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSearch
-
taking requiring just compensation, regardless of the extent of the occupation or its economic impact. See Loretto v. TeleprompterSearch
-
See Bolling v. SharpeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. SperrySearch
-
United States v. SperrySearch
-
Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
Loretto v. TeleprompterSearch
-
Cf. Pittsburgh v. AlcoSearch
-
Cf. FCC v. FloridaSearch
-
Cf. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. R.ASearch
-
See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
See United States v. Munoz-FloresSearch
-
Flint v. StoneSearch
-
Gray v. UnitedSearch
-
American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial