Citation network
Perry Vs. Leeke
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 10, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 272 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. LeekeSearch
-
U.S. 272 (1989) Perry v. LeekeSearch
-
his lawyer, during the break. In affirming petitioner's conviction, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
that petitioner's conviction should stand because the trial court's error was not prejudicial under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
joined, post, p. 488 U. S. 285 . JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
App. 4-5. The Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed petitioner's conviction. State v. PerrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AllenSearch
-
Stubbs v. BordenkircherSearch
-
because the error was not prejudicial. This conclusion rested on the court's view that our opinions in United States v. CronicSearch
-
U. S. 648 (1984), and Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
United States v. CronicSearch
-
Glasser v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 76 (1942). The disposition in Geders was also consistent with our later decision in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
ways with the ability of counsel to make independent decisions about how to conduct the defense. See, e.g., Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
Herring v. NewSearch
-
a defendant of the right to effective assistance, simply by failing to render 'adequate legal assistance,' Cuyler v. SullivanSearch
-
in determining whether the quality of a lawyer's performance itself has been constitutionally ineffective. See Penson v. OhioSearch
-
United States v. DiLapiSearch
-
for advice on a variety of trial-related matters that is controlling in the context of a long recess. See Geders v. UnitedSearch
-
I agree with the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. AllenSearch
-
that it should never be interfered with for any length of time, absent some compelling reason. See also Stubbs v. BordenkircherSearch
-
State v. PerrySearch
-
of orders barring a criminal defendant's access to his or her attorney during a trial recess. See Sanders v. LaneSearch
-
Bova v. DuggerSearch
-
Crutchfield v. WainwrightSearch
-
Mudd v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. VasquezSearch
-
Bailey v. RedmanSearch
-
United States v. AllenSearch
-
Ashurst v. StateSearch
-
State v. MebaneSearch
-
Bailey v. StateSearch
-
McFadden v. StateSearch
-
Bova v. StateSearch
-
People v. StronerSearch
-
Wooten-Bey v. StateSearch
-
People v. HagenSearch
-
Jerry Parks Equipment Co. v. SoutheastSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. LeekeSearch
-
of the Court. In Geders v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial