Citation network
Owens Vs. Okure
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 10, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 235 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Owens v. OkureSearch
-
U.S. 235 (1989) Owens v. OkureSearch
-
s general or residual personal injury statute of limitations. Pp. 488 U. S. 239 -250. (a) Although Wilson v. GarciaSearch
-
delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. In Wilson v. GarciaSearch
-
Board of Regents, Univ. of New York v. TomanioSearch
-
Johnson v. RailwaySearch
-
as the chosen limitations period was consistent with federal law and policy. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California v. EEOCSearch
-
Burnett v. GrattanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Felder v. CaseySearch
-
remedy is one that can 'override certain kinds of state laws,' Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
U. S. 173 (1961), and is, in all events, 'supplementary to any remedy any State might have,' McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
U. S. 668 , 373 U. S. 672 (1963), it can have no precise counterpart in state law. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Many of these claims bear little if any resemblance to the common law intentional tort. See Felder v. CaseySearch
-
necessary intent is often different from the intent requirement of a related common law tort. E.g., Hustler Magazine v. FalwellSearch
-
See Preuit & Mauldin v. JonesSearch
-
Mulligan v. HazardSearch
-
Gates v. SpinksSearch
-
Jones v. PreuitSearch
-
The Fifth and Sixth Circuits, however, on several occasions have departed from this approach. See, e.g., Kline v. NorthSearch
-
Carroll v. WilkersonSearch
-
per curiam) (selecting Michigan general personal injury statute of limitations), cert. denied sub nom. County of Wayne v. WilkersonSearch
-
Meade v. GrubbsSearch
-
Banks v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
Small v. InhabitantsSearch
-
McKay v. HammockSearch
-
appropriate limitations period for a few intentional torts that are not enumerated in that statute, see, e.g., Koster v. ChaseSearch
-
Rio v. PresbyterianSearch
-
Hansen v. PetroneSearch
-
Briscoe v. LaHueSearch
-
one embraces, either explicitly or by judicial construction, unspecified personal injury actions. See, e.g., Small v. InhabitantsSearch
-
Alley v. DodgeSearch
-
actions would be inconsistent with federal interests. See Burnett v. GrattanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Owens v. OkureSearch
-
Although Wilson v. GarciaSearch
-
of the Court. In Wilson v. GarciaSearch
-
McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
See Felder v. CaseySearch
-
E.g., Hustler Magazine v. FalwellSearch
-
Kline v. NorthSearch
-
County of Wayne v. WilkersonSearch
-
Meade v. GrubbsSearch
-
Koster v. ChaseSearch
-
See Burnett v. GrattanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial