Citation network
Osterneck Vs. Ernst and Whinney
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 21, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Osterneck v. ErnstSearch
-
Whinney - 489 U.S. 169 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Osterneck v. ErnstSearch
-
Whinney, 489 U.S. 169 (1989) Osterneck v. ErnstSearch
-
The court also rejected petitioners' contention that Thompson v. INSSearch
-
exception to the timely appeal requirement announced in Thompson v. INSSearch
-
The Court of Appeals rejected petitioners' contention, based on our decision in White v. NewSearch
-
of action. 825 F.2d at 1526. The Court of Appeals also rejected petitioners' contention that our decision in Thompson v. INSSearch
-
interest filed after the entry of judgment constitutes a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Cf. Jenkins v. WhittakerSearch
-
dispose of all motions that seek to amend or alter what otherwise might appear to be a final judgment. A White v. NewSearch
-
U.S. at 455 U. S. 451 , citing Browder v. DirectorSearch
-
U. S. 452 . We revisited the question of what constitutes a Rule 59(e) motion last Term. In Buchanan v. StanshipsSearch
-
U.S. at 485 U. S. 268 . In Budinich v. BectonSearch
-
West Virginia v. UnitedSearch
-
General Motors Corp. v. DevexSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Norte & Co. v. HuffinesSearch
-
F.2d 1189, 1191-1192 (CA2 1969), cert. denied sub nom. Muscat v. NorteSearch
-
City National Bank v. AmericanSearch
-
Fox v. Kane-MillerSearch
-
Blau v. LehmanSearch
-
e) motion also helps further the important goal of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of judgments. Cf. United States v. HollywoodSearch
-
interest, the Court of Appeals nevertheless should have heard their appeal based on the rationale of Thompson v. INSSearch
-
Budinich v. BectonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Osterneck v. ErnstSearch
-
Thompson v. INSSearch
-
White v. NewSearch
-
Cf. Jenkins v. WhittakerSearch
-
A White v. NewSearch
-
Browder v. DirectorSearch
-
Term. In Buchanan v. StanshipsSearch
-
In Budinich v. BectonSearch
-
General Motors Corp. v. DevexSearch
-
Muscat v. NorteSearch
-
Cf. United States v. HollywoodSearch
-
of Thompson v. INSSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial