Citation network
Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. Vs. Bruch
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 21, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
U.S. 101 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
U.S. 101 (1989) Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
in cases where fiduciaries and administrators had some bias or adverse interest. Id. at 138-140. See, e.g., Jung v. FMCSearch
-
for participants and beneficiaries of benefit plans. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
Nachman Corp. v. PensionSearch
-
c), a provision of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (LMRA). See, e.g., Struble v. NewSearch
-
Bayles v. CentralSearch
-
n. 3 (CA5 1979). In light of Congress' general intent to incorporate much of LMRA fiduciary law into ERISA, see NLRB v. AmaxSearch
-
c) by beneficiaries of LMRA plans who were denied benefits by trustees. See Van Boxel v. JournalSearch
-
a), 1132(f). See generally Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
supra, at 481 U. S. 56 . See also Franchise Tax Board v. ConstructionSearch
-
a)(1)(B), we are guided by principles of trust law. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 724 -725 (1875) (emphasis added). See also Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. CentralSearch
-
Comment b (1959). See also United States v. MasonSearch
-
U. S. 113 by looking to the terms of the plan and other manifestations of the parties' intent. See, e.g., Conner v. PhoenixSearch
-
Atlantic Steel Co. v. KitchensSearch
-
Sigman v. RudolphSearch
-
exercises any discretionary authority or control. Cf. United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSearch
-
Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
to act on the proposed bill is not conclusive of Congress' views on the appropriate standard of review. Bowsher v. MerckSearch
-
Saladino v. I.LSearch
-
to vested benefits, Kuntz v. ReeseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSearch
-
Jung v. FMCSearch
-
Struble v. NewSearch
-
NLRB v. AmaxSearch
-
See Van Boxel v. JournalSearch
-
Franchise Tax Board v. ConstructionSearch
-
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. CentralSearch
-
Conner v. PhoenixSearch
-
Cf. United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSearch
-
Bowsher v. MerckSearch
-
Kuntz v. ReeseSearch
-
United States v. PriceSearch
-
United States v. MasonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial