Citation network
Harris Vs. Reed
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 255 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. ReedSearch
-
U.S. 255 (1989) Harris v. ReedSearch
-
of Michigan v. LongSearch
-
the Illinois Appellate Court had held this claim to be waived under Illinois law, this Court's decision in Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
confusion among the courts evidently stems from a failure to recognize that the procedural default rule of Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
basis for the court's decision. See, e.g., Fox Film Corp. v. MullerSearch
-
Murdock v. CitySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
state ground for its judgment may be rendered difficult by ambiguity in the state court's opinion. In Michigan v. LongSearch
-
of whether the disputed state law ground is substantive (as it was in Long ) or procedural, as in Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
applies on federal habeas. 433 U.S. at 433 U. S. 81 , 433 U. S. 87 . See also Ulster County Court v. AllenSearch
-
Id. at 477 U. S. 495 , quoting Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
U. S. 107 , 456 U. S. 135 (1982). See also Smith v. MurraySearch
-
if the last state court rendering a judgment in the case rests its judgment on the procedural default. See Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
Ulster County Court v. AllenSearch
-
Habeas review thus presents the same problem of ambiguity that this Court resolved in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
law ground, this Court may address a federal issue considered by the state court. We applied that rule in Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
has been alert in recognizing that federal habeas review touches upon these significant state interests. Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
rely on waiver as a ground for rejecting any aspect of petitioner's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim. Michigan v. LongSearch
-
Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
U. S. 478 (1986), and Smith v. MurraySearch
-
Hardin v. BlackSearch
-
whether state court denied relief because of a procedural default or because of its view of the merits), with Brasier v. DouglasSearch
-
the state court alternatively relied on a procedural bar), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 (1987), and with Shepard v. FoltzSearch
-
upon a procedural bar, the federal court should examine the arguments presented to the state court). See also Mann v. DuggerSearch
-
F.2d 1471, 1487-1489 (CA11 1987) (Clark, J., specially concurring) (the Michigan v. LongSearch
-
judges, indeed, have analyzed the problem in terms of the adequate and independent state ground doctrine. See Meadows v. HollandSearch
-
Mann v. DuggerSearch
-
Herndon v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Ake v. OklahomaSearch
-
Johnson v. MississippiSearch
-
requirement. See, e.g., Michigan v. ChesternutSearch
-
Delaware v. VanSearch
-
be presented to a state court if it is clear that the state court would hold the claim procedurally barred. Castille v. PeoplesSearch
-
basis for the state court's judgment, even when the state court also relies on federal law. See Fox Film Corp. v. MullerSearch
-
is no basis for a federal habeas court's refusing to consider the merits of the federal claim. See Ulster County Court v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. at 463 U. S. 1040 -1041. JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring. In view of my dissent in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
is unique virtue in applying the rule of that case to the problem presented by this case. My dissent in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
See Delaware v. VanSearch
-
Arsdall, 475 U. S. 673 , 475 U. S. 692 (1986) (STEVENS, J., dissenting) (quoting King Bridge Co. v. OtoeSearch
-
U. S. 225 , 120 U. S. 226 (1887)). Second, in its original form, the presumption adopted in Michigan v. LongSearch
-
state procedural bar constitutes an adequate and independent state ground for denying relief. As our decisions in Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
U. S. 391 , 372 U. S. 426 -435 (1963), and Wainwright v. SykesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial