Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

U.S. Vs. Ron Pair Enterprises

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 22, 1989

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

69 entries 6 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bass US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  2. United States Vs. Monia US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1943
  3. Costanzo Vs. Tillinghast US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1932
  4. Landreth Timber Co. Vs. Landreth US Supreme Court · May 28, 1985
  5. United States Vs. Naftalin US Supreme Court · May 21, 1979
    Relied / Followed
  6. U.S. v. Ron
    Search
  7. Pair Enterprises - 489 U.S. 235 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. Ron
    Search
  8. Pair Enterprises, 489 U.S. 235 (1989) United States v. Ron
    Search
  9. b)'s language clearly directs that post-petition interest be paid on all oversecured claims. Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  10. Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection, 474 U. S. 494 , and Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  11. this result was in direct conflict with the view of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, see Best Repair Co. v. United
    Search
  12. significant changes in both the substantive and procedural laws of bankruptcy. See Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  13. with the language of the statute itself. Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth
    Search
  14. Caminetti v. United
    Search
  15. modifies it as well. See Best Repair Co. v. United
    Search
  16. Griffin v. Oceanic
    Search
  17. us to enforce it. It is respondent's view, as it was the view of the Court of Appeals, that Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  18. Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection, 474 U. S. 494 (1986), and Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  19. Id. at 474 U. S. 505 , quoting Chemical Manufacturers Assn. v. Natural
    Search
  20. Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. at 458 U. S. 571 . A similar issue presented itself in Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  21. was, indeed, a pre-Code rule that the running of interest ceased when a bankruptcy petition was filed. See Sexton v. Dreyfus
    Search
  22. earned by securities held by the creditor as collateral to be applied to post-petition interest. See City of New York v. Saper
    Search
  23. an exception for oversecured claims. At least one Court of Appeals refused to apply this exception, United States v. Harrington
    Search
  24. was some uncertainty among courts which did recognize it as to whether this Court ever had done so. United States v. Bass
    Search
  25. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green
    Search
  26. the oversecured Page 489 U. S. 247 claim exception to an oversecured federal tax claim. See United States v. Harrington
    Search
  27. Maine Corp., 719 F.2d 493, 496 (CA1 1983) (municipal property tax claim), cert. denied sub nom. City of Cambridge v. Meserve
    Search
  28. the fact that all the cases that limited the third exception were tax lien cases. Each gave weight to City of New York v. Saper
    Search
  29. tax claims, and reasoned that the broad language of that case denied it for all tax claims. See United States v. Harrington
    Search
  30. F. 145, 148-149 (WD Ky.1901), and was uniformly accepted at the time Congress was considering the Code. See Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  31. b), is clear and unambiguous. Second, the Court takes a very narrow view of Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search
  32. and nonconsensual liens would not accrue post-petition interest. See Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Mor
    Search
  33. U. S. 341 , 287 U. S. 344 (1932). See also Barrett v. Van
    Search
  34. Ewing v. Burnet
    Search
  35. to change or ignore the punctuation in legislation in order to effectuate congressional intent. See, e.g., Simpson v. United
    Search
  36. Stephens v. Cherokee
    Search
  37. is not controlling, it can provide useful confirmation of conclusions drawn from the words of a statute. United States v. Naftalin
    Search
  38. pre-Code law unless there is some indication that Congress thought that it was effecting such a change. See Kelly v. Robinson
    Search
  39. quoting TVA v. Hill
    Search
  40. allow post-petition interest on nonconsensual liens such as the tax lien involved in this case. See City of New York v. Saper
    Search
  41. United States v. Mighell
    Search
  42. United States v. Harrington
    Search
  43. post-Code case not allowing post-petition interest on municipal tax lien), cert. denied sub nom. City of Cambridge v. Meserve
    Search
  44. Ante at 489 U. S. 246 . Regardless of how it is labeled, cf. Henneford v. Silas
    Search
  45. United Savings Association of Texas v. Timbers
    Search
  46. Best Repair Co. v. United
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. Ron
    Search
  48. United States v. Ron
    Search
  49. Midlantic National Bank v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial